Reduction of fleets efficiency
-
Neimenljivi
- Forum Zombie
- Posts: 6140
- Joined: Sat Jun 17, 2006 12:23 am
- Alliance: Lone wolf
- Race: Slovenian
- ID: 82089
- Location: Slovenia
Re: Reduction of fleets efficiency
Fact is that it widens the gap between $ and normal players, you can't argue that, Sarevok 
- Robe
- Aussie Icon
- Posts: 3093
- Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2005 10:59 pm
- Alliance: The Legion
- Race: Vampyre
- ID: 14876
- Location: Down Under
-
Honours and Awards
Re: Reduction of fleets efficiency
Not true.Sarevok wrote:Robe is a prime example. She got most of her fleet power by the entire empire pouring resources into her MS, so she could take down FUALL planets.
TL like many other alliances had a short term program to improve several ships and this is unlikely to repeated again.
The naq I received (and gave) represents a small percentage of the overall cost to build my ship over many years.
Top fleets can not take defences now now let alone after these updates so this change will result in many planets becoming untakeable (not just a few).
This will provide a significant advantage to players at the top of the game and continue to widen the gap between the "Haves" and the "Have Nots".
Given that players can 100% protect all planets on PPT and merlin, making planets even harder to take now will remove valuable planets from the battle field and result in some players becoming untouchable in game.
Its a crying shame to destroy such a fun feature of the game simply because a handful of players complained they lost a valuable planet because they forgot to PPT or merlin.
2011 DescensionsBuck wrote:The Great and Complex GateWars Novel!
The Forces of Light... Robe, The Novels Main Protagonist, The Polar opposite of EtL... Or is she?
Are they that different? There battles have encompassed entire careers and lives within the game, the most bitter and epic of enemies, neither will leave while the other stands... the ultimate climax, will it ever come?
Who knows. One things for sure, the Freedom Fighter is in it for the long haul, its in her head now,
and she must save the world or die trying.

















2010 Descensions
Spoiler






-
Sarevok
- Forum Addict
- Posts: 4042
- Joined: Wed May 09, 2007 7:42 pm
- Race: NanoTiMaster
- ID: 0
Re: Reduction of fleets efficiency
And thus no updates should be done. Superb logic.Neimenljivi wrote:Fact is that it widens the gap between $ and normal players, you can't argue that, Sarevok![]()
Fact is, any update that is done, will give an advantage to anyone that is willing to spend. Unless you can think of one that wouldn't give an advantage, I'd like to hear it
viewtopic.php?f=13&t=162732
Suggestions, Comments please
Suggestions, Comments please
R8 wrote:TEAM WORK WILL BEAT $$ ANYDAY OF THE WEEKangel wrote:Except the payday [-X
12agnar0k wrote:Also it's still not a war game, you have att/def weps yes, but you also have uu and UP, does this mean its a sex game, oh no, XRATEDSGW, THIS GAME IS PORN!
Ban Admin
<+CABAL> so adminHere, ever thought about playing SGW? :b
<~adminHere> cabal - i do
<+CABAL>
<+Sarevok> Cabal, look up Jtest
<~adminHere> no -not jtest
<~adminHere> anotheri am a multi
<+Sarevok> :O
* +CABAL screens
<+CABAL> :b
* +Sarevok Ban's Admin
-
beliblisk
- Forum Expert
- Posts: 1319
- Joined: Sun Apr 13, 2008 6:49 am
- Alliance: TA
- Race: Resistance
- ID: 68961
Re: Reduction of fleets efficiency
.......em maybe stop stupid updating...........maybe things(planets-fleets) are balanced now........maybe even house thing is stupid..........maybe people wont leave game............

With 6,401,820,330,144 power remaining, they manage to eliminate 2994000 of Super Tadz's Covert Ops!
With 111,151,377,807,302 power remaining, they manage to eliminate 9330796 of EnterTheLion's Undercover Agents!
With 2,663,022,177,462 power remaining, they manage to eliminate 3840816 of Rube_Dragon's Covert Agents!
Considering the distance to travel, the enthusiasm of the troops for this battle, and the degree to which they were comfortable in their victory,and 8,880,526 Untrained Jaffa ware taken from the realm of XYZ.
-
Sarevok
- Forum Addict
- Posts: 4042
- Joined: Wed May 09, 2007 7:42 pm
- Race: NanoTiMaster
- ID: 0
Re: Reduction of fleets efficiency
Yes. Lets keep playing the same thing for years on end. Sounds terribly exciting.
viewtopic.php?f=13&t=162732
Suggestions, Comments please
Suggestions, Comments please
R8 wrote:TEAM WORK WILL BEAT $$ ANYDAY OF THE WEEKangel wrote:Except the payday [-X
12agnar0k wrote:Also it's still not a war game, you have att/def weps yes, but you also have uu and UP, does this mean its a sex game, oh no, XRATEDSGW, THIS GAME IS PORN!
Ban Admin
<+CABAL> so adminHere, ever thought about playing SGW? :b
<~adminHere> cabal - i do
<+CABAL>
<+Sarevok> Cabal, look up Jtest
<~adminHere> no -not jtest
<~adminHere> anotheri am a multi
<+Sarevok> :O
* +CABAL screens
<+CABAL> :b
* +Sarevok Ban's Admin
-
Neimenljivi
- Forum Zombie
- Posts: 6140
- Joined: Sat Jun 17, 2006 12:23 am
- Alliance: Lone wolf
- Race: Slovenian
- ID: 82089
- Location: Slovenia
Re: Reduction of fleets efficiency
Sarevok wrote:And thus no updates should be done. Superb logic.Neimenljivi wrote:Fact is that it widens the gap between $ and normal players, you can't argue that, Sarevok![]()
Fact is, any update that is done, will give an advantage to anyone that is willing to spend. Unless you can think of one that wouldn't give an advantage, I'd like to hear it
Here's a thought - how about adjusting the bonuses automatically - for each 5 mil planet defenses you destroy you need 1% fleet power less to successfully attack a planet (being that your pilots are more experienced and all that poo), so if you destroyed 10 million planet defenses you don't need 17,5% of natural defense (after the new updates) to attack a planet but only 15,5%, while for each 2 million fleets you destroy someone who wants to take your planet has to have 1% more fleet power (as you are experienced in fighting against fleets), so if you destroyed 2 million fleets and someone wanted to conquer your planet - s/he'd need 18,5% of natural defense power opposed to 17,5%.
This is adjusted through pure skill, player vs player, not how much cash you invested, so THIS gives EVERYONE and NOONE a bigger advantage than they already have.
~N
-
Sarevok
- Forum Addict
- Posts: 4042
- Joined: Wed May 09, 2007 7:42 pm
- Race: NanoTiMaster
- ID: 0
Re: Reduction of fleets efficiency
Ok. Buy 100T naq, and get someone to waste fleets on your planets. Done. 4m fleets gone, meaning the person defending against fleets is now at 19.5%, instead of 17.5%, and ANYONE trying to take them on doesn't know this. Unless they've taken out 20m planet defences to counter this.
viewtopic.php?f=13&t=162732
Suggestions, Comments please
Suggestions, Comments please
R8 wrote:TEAM WORK WILL BEAT $$ ANYDAY OF THE WEEKangel wrote:Except the payday [-X
12agnar0k wrote:Also it's still not a war game, you have att/def weps yes, but you also have uu and UP, does this mean its a sex game, oh no, XRATEDSGW, THIS GAME IS PORN!
Ban Admin
<+CABAL> so adminHere, ever thought about playing SGW? :b
<~adminHere> cabal - i do
<+CABAL>
<+Sarevok> Cabal, look up Jtest
<~adminHere> no -not jtest
<~adminHere> anotheri am a multi
<+Sarevok> :O
* +CABAL screens
<+CABAL> :b
* +Sarevok Ban's Admin
-
Neimenljivi
- Forum Zombie
- Posts: 6140
- Joined: Sat Jun 17, 2006 12:23 am
- Alliance: Lone wolf
- Race: Slovenian
- ID: 82089
- Location: Slovenia
Re: Reduction of fleets efficiency
Sarevok wrote:Ok. Buy 100T naq, and get someone to waste fleets on your planets. Done. 4m fleets gone, meaning the person defending against fleets is now at 19.5%, instead of 17.5%, and ANYONE trying to take them on doesn't know this. Unless they've taken out 20m planet defences to counter this.
Ok. Buy the game off Jason and give yourself unlimited naq, stats and everything
Of course player$ will achieve everything a lot more easily, the difference is that now those of us that mass planets and don't use $ could counter them.
~N
-
beliblisk
- Forum Expert
- Posts: 1319
- Joined: Sun Apr 13, 2008 6:49 am
- Alliance: TA
- Race: Resistance
- ID: 68961
Re: Reduction of fleets efficiency
Neimenljivi wrote:Sarevok wrote:Ok. Buy 100T naq, and get someone to waste fleets on your planets. Done. 4m fleets gone, meaning the person defending against fleets is now at 19.5%, instead of 17.5%, and ANYONE trying to take them on doesn't know this. Unless they've taken out 20m planet defences to counter this.
Ok. Buy the game off Jason and give yourself unlimited naq, stats and everything![]()
Of course player$ will achieve everything a lot more easily, the difference is that now those of us that mass planets and don't use $ could counter them.
~N
....or soon will be able to......

With 6,401,820,330,144 power remaining, they manage to eliminate 2994000 of Super Tadz's Covert Ops!
With 111,151,377,807,302 power remaining, they manage to eliminate 9330796 of EnterTheLion's Undercover Agents!
With 2,663,022,177,462 power remaining, they manage to eliminate 3840816 of Rube_Dragon's Covert Agents!
Considering the distance to travel, the enthusiasm of the troops for this battle, and the degree to which they were comfortable in their victory,and 8,880,526 Untrained Jaffa ware taken from the realm of XYZ.
-
Sarevok
- Forum Addict
- Posts: 4042
- Joined: Wed May 09, 2007 7:42 pm
- Race: NanoTiMaster
- ID: 0
Re: Reduction of fleets efficiency
Hang on. All i did was backup my statement, by taking your "update" and showing how a spender STILL gets the edge.Neimenljivi wrote:Ok. Buy the game off Jason and give yourself unlimited naq, stats and everything![]()
Of course player$ will achieve everything a lot more easily, the difference is that now those of us that mass planets and don't use $ could counter them.
~N
And "Fact is that" those whom spend $ on fleets will also have the edge anyway.Sarevok wrote:And thus no updates should be done. Superb logic.Neimenljivi wrote:Fact is that it widens the gap between $ and normal players, you can't argue that, Sarevok![]()
Fact is, any update that is done, will give an advantage to anyone that is willing to spend. Unless you can think of one that wouldn't give an advantage, I'd like to hear it
viewtopic.php?f=13&t=162732
Suggestions, Comments please
Suggestions, Comments please
R8 wrote:TEAM WORK WILL BEAT $$ ANYDAY OF THE WEEKangel wrote:Except the payday [-X
12agnar0k wrote:Also it's still not a war game, you have att/def weps yes, but you also have uu and UP, does this mean its a sex game, oh no, XRATEDSGW, THIS GAME IS PORN!
Ban Admin
<+CABAL> so adminHere, ever thought about playing SGW? :b
<~adminHere> cabal - i do
<+CABAL>
<+Sarevok> Cabal, look up Jtest
<~adminHere> no -not jtest
<~adminHere> anotheri am a multi
<+Sarevok> :O
* +CABAL screens
<+CABAL> :b
* +Sarevok Ban's Admin
-
beliblisk
- Forum Expert
- Posts: 1319
- Joined: Sun Apr 13, 2008 6:49 am
- Alliance: TA
- Race: Resistance
- ID: 68961
Re: Reduction of fleets efficiency
You really dont get it that in near future non money spenders could take even the most defended $$$$$$$$$$$$$$ spenders planets?
Could if they % would stay the same........but no,why not giving then a bit more air to breath
Could if they % would stay the same........but no,why not giving then a bit more air to breath

With 6,401,820,330,144 power remaining, they manage to eliminate 2994000 of Super Tadz's Covert Ops!
With 111,151,377,807,302 power remaining, they manage to eliminate 9330796 of EnterTheLion's Undercover Agents!
With 2,663,022,177,462 power remaining, they manage to eliminate 3840816 of Rube_Dragon's Covert Agents!
Considering the distance to travel, the enthusiasm of the troops for this battle, and the degree to which they were comfortable in their victory,and 8,880,526 Untrained Jaffa ware taken from the realm of XYZ.
-
Neimenljivi
- Forum Zombie
- Posts: 6140
- Joined: Sat Jun 17, 2006 12:23 am
- Alliance: Lone wolf
- Race: Slovenian
- ID: 82089
- Location: Slovenia
Re: Reduction of fleets efficiency
Yes like beli said.
Sarevok you probably are not one of the people who mass planets, otherwise you would have known how hard it is to mass a well defended planet as it is, especially due to platforms too, and these updates just make it 2-3 times harder...
~N
Sarevok you probably are not one of the people who mass planets, otherwise you would have known how hard it is to mass a well defended planet as it is, especially due to platforms too, and these updates just make it 2-3 times harder...
~N
- jedi~tank
- Forum Zombie
- Posts: 9936
- Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2007 12:43 pm
- ID: 0
- Location: Creepin in the back door
Re: Reduction of fleets efficiency
LOL $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ Noobs. Screw the updates on planets and fleets. $$$whiners ![[115.gif] :smt115](./images/smilies/115.gif)
![[115.gif] :smt115](./images/smilies/115.gif)



"What I want to see is a tight knit group not a collection of people pulling in different directions"
Deni
-
stuff of legends
- Forum Expert
- Posts: 1217
- Joined: Sat May 23, 2009 1:50 am
- Alliance: The Legion
- Location: China Beijing
Re: Reduction of fleets efficiency
they should just make defences cheaper and fleets a tad more powerful.


-
Neimenljivi
- Forum Zombie
- Posts: 6140
- Joined: Sat Jun 17, 2006 12:23 am
- Alliance: Lone wolf
- Race: Slovenian
- ID: 82089
- Location: Slovenia
Re: Reduction of fleets efficiency
stuff of legends wrote:they should just make defences cheaper and fleets a tad more powerful.
Defenses have been made cheaper so yes, the only logical thing to do would now be to make fleets more powerful or remove the updates to making defs cheaper
JT - still acting as a noob, like always
~N



