Page 7 of 7

Posted: Sun Apr 23, 2006 5:36 am
by agapooka
If this is implemented, people will quite quickly gain all the techs (especially people that attack a lot, like the Tauri, hence giving them an advantage). Once people have all the techs, their stats will be higher than the ascended, and ascending (which is costly) will be worthless. Do not devalue ascension.

Also, if you can steal tech points, then they will be traded for on the market (kinda like naquadriah in chaos). They should be "unstealable", and they whould grow very slowly. Also, ascended people should technically be able to already have all tech... :P

I'm only commenting on the tech stealing idea because it's the only thing I read. Sometimes, being concise is helpful.

Here's how I think stealing tech should go:

You get tech points with a level that is similar to alert levels. The higher the level, the more tech points you get, but the less income you get. The more tech points you have, the more the chance that you steal tech. Everytime you attack, you might lose a tech point, but maybe 1% of the time, you can get a 1% increase to stats. (Whole techs would imbalance the game too much. The last Asgard defense tech alone doubles your defense.)

-Jason

Posted: Sat May 06, 2006 12:36 am
by [SGC_ReplicÅtors]
hmmm intresting idea with the "realm covert"........

Posted: Wed May 17, 2006 6:25 am
by gooseman the first
I WANT THIS UPGRADE!!!
its so big and unnessicary!!
i must have it!!!
but yea great idea

Posted: Fri May 26, 2006 8:04 am
by *zesh*
it does give a massive disadvantage to the ascended though which does kinda suck. lol i need to know if it will happen and then ill delay or cancel my ascension

It wont be worth it to ascend either. U already lose so much in ascension that some ppl dont even bother doing it. No1 will actually want to ascend as this method gives ua significant bonus but u dont get the massive loses u incur in ascension

Posted: Fri May 26, 2006 1:42 pm
by Thewisesirivanthes
Someone likes Utopia, Earth2025, and Black Nova Traders as I can see some heavy influence in your suggestions.

Posted: Fri Jun 02, 2006 1:34 pm
by [SGC_ReplicÅtors]
ya it does but my bigeest push is the tech idea

Posted: Fri Jun 02, 2006 3:26 pm
by dragon99
i like this idea. especially the alliance wars thing. very well thought out. The war meter is a very interesting idea. and i love the news box thing. i can never tell who's at war with who is sgw and whos supposed to be helping.

Posted: Sun Jun 04, 2006 1:19 pm
by barakek
its a well thaught out proposal but its too much of a drastic redesighn i think a new game "SGW tech wars" would be more appropriate it would alter the focus of the game

Posted: Sun Jun 04, 2006 2:00 pm
by [SGC_ReplicÅtors]
barakek wrote:its a well thaught out proposal but its too much of a drastic redesighn i think a new game "SGW tech wars" would be more appropriate it would alter the focus of the game


srry to say but this game been altered already

Posted: Sun Jun 04, 2006 2:39 pm
by CuffX
Thewisesirivanthes wrote:Someone likes Utopia, Earth2025, and Black Nova Traders as I can see some heavy influence in your suggestions.

Ahaha I was just going to post that :D ahhh Swirve games...

I love the Alliance idea but the tech idea scares me (mainly because I'm a bit confused on how it works and change scares the living crap out of me).

One of the reasons I dislike the tech idea is because it gives a huge disadvantage to the shell accounts. Like if you do something to one side you would have to even it out for the others...

As for the alliance idea, I DEMAND IT TO BE PLACED IMMEDIATELY :-D .

Posted: Sun Jun 04, 2006 2:46 pm
by [SGC_ReplicÅtors]
PPL READ.... it nots for ascneded accounts just regualr accounts

Posted: Sun Jun 04, 2006 2:54 pm
by barakek
i understand what your saying but this isnt just "hmmm shall i biuld a mothership" or "do i have enough naq to start looking for planets" its "arrrrg if i dont compete for tech ime gonna be left behind" ime not critisizing the way youve put it together youve done tons of work and its all presented perfectly i just think its WAY too far reaching and while i like the idea of making alliance wars/pacts official in game terms (ie:what sort of treaty you have between alliances) think how much confusion could have been avioded with that whole AK/Omega/CF thing if all alliances had thier relationships clearly defined i realy dont like the idea of stances i would feel like i was relingquishing controll of vital parts of my account to others

as i say you obviosly have put alot of thaught and inteligence into this but i think like alot of very intelligent people youve let your idea run away with you and it realy goes too far in terms of altering the focus of the game and drasticly alter the way its played

personaly (and it is just a personal opinion) i think you would have to water down and/or simplify the proposal a great deal before this could get of the ground

and not just that but it kinda negates the piont of having races in the first place after all if tauri boost thier defence and asgaurd boost thier attack then the end up the same......... a bit bland it negates the whole piont of choosing a race!