StarGateWars Forums

Grand Admiral Martin wrote:
or why don't we just let Bush keep doing a good job, 4 more years!!

(Are there white male candidates for Dems, or are they totally going for that minority vote? Or.. women aren't a minority when looking at it that way.)

Auriel wrote:(Are there white male candidates for Dems, or are they totally going for that minority vote?

Apophis The Great wrote:Elections are one of few reasons I would wish to be american, I'll explain why.
Why? because I would be able to vote there, and such I could proudly can count me in the group of people who stopped the war machine wishing to destroy any muslim country (Iraq, soon Iran?, wondering who's next...probably Pakistan because they become more & more "hard to handle" since assassination of Benazir Bhutto and assaults on Pervez Musharraf's party supporters and other opposition parties, they could become an unstable menace...), by electing the side that represents the best the majority of people, from most poor classes to middle class, which I believe represent like 72-77% of US population.

You may wonder who I talk about?

If you know me, you would be sure of who I mean. I'm in favour of changement, equality and end to old white men holding in presidentship. Afterall, a president represents its country. So...as far as I know, US (or any other) country isn't for sure only composed by white men, I'm all in favour of a representing president, in other words, not necessarly white, but black, "latino", and not necessarly male.

Apophis the Great wrote:My choice for democrats is maybe because I'm doing school in economy, so I'm fully aware of problems liberal economy causes. WAY TOO much random results it does.

Apophis the Great wrote:I'm not american, I dont give a heck what any of you think of my opinion, I am all for Barack Obama victory, and from what I seen, many white people support him too! (they are not ashamed to support someone who has different skin than them but same ideas than them, and they surely count fact he's black because america needs finally to have a black president considering amount of african american people living there, about time it would be!!)

Auriel wrote:

Apophis The Great wrote:Elections are one of few reasons I would wish to be american, I'll explain why.
Why? because I would be able to vote there, and such I could proudly can count me in the group of people who stopped the war machine wishing to destroy any muslim country (Iraq, soon Iran?, wondering who's next...probably Pakistan because they become more & more "hard to handle" since assassination of Benazir Bhutto and assaults on Pervez Musharraf's party supporters and other opposition parties, they could become an unstable menace...), by electing the side that represents the best the majority of people, from most poor classes to middle class, which I believe represent like 72-77% of US population.

You may wonder who I talk about?

If you know me, you would be sure of who I mean. I'm in favour of changement, equality and end to old white men holding in presidentship. Afterall, a president represents its country. So...as far as I know, US (or any other) country isn't for sure only composed by white men, I'm all in favour of a representing president, in other words, not necessarly white, but black, "latino", and not necessarly male.

You would rather see an end to presidents altogether, wouldn't you Jim?
See presidents all over the world replaced by committees existing of representatives of all groups in society. (a huge mess.. I believe they call that Congress?)

Governement is sufficient, congress would be hard to keep stable, as there would have power fightings to hold supremacy or whatever we call it, as long as extreme parties are FORBIDDEN from elections (not democratic? Do you see ANY caring from me there it's not democratic?? Think no)

Apophis the Great wrote:My choice for democrats is maybe because I'm doing school in economy, so I'm fully aware of problems liberal economy causes. WAY TOO much random results it does.

*cough*
And what to think of overspending? The USA currently has a budget deficit, and yes, that's mainly due to the Just War USA is fighting in countries that need to be taught some .. dare I say it .. civilisation. You heard right.. civilisation. It is prudent to learn from our past mistakes (letting colonies slip away into uncivilised anarchy and uneducated mismanagement), and teach countries wherever they are what it means to be civilised. If need be, at gunpoint (as it happens, this is part of our civilisation).
To get back to the issue at hand.. Democrats would sell out the country, create about 500 BILLION dollars in extra deficit, which would have to be filled in by the Taxpaying Population. Rather.. counterproductive, don't you think?

VERY FUNNY! MOST OF DEMOCRATS ARE AGAIST IRAQI WAR! THINK A BIT! If they came in power, they would STOP this deep sh** deficit! Your republicans, would they stop it? Dont even dream of it! So before going all yaddda yadda democrats waste money see how much american republicans did in Iraq (afghan war was needed, see noone was against it unlike iraqi war, reason(S) maybe??), how much? 400bil per year I believe almost.
Would democrats "waste" money? OF COURSE! Would they waste it to fight a country 10000 kilometers away? OF COURSE NOT! Would they "waste" it instead for americans such as improve the famous public school department (not for its efficientness unfortuantely)? NO DOUBT!! Would it profit more americans to "waste" money on fixing problems in their country than looking for new enemies 10000km away? NO DOUBTS AGAIN!!!
Is it their business to care how an AUTOCRATIC country with NO LINK with Al qaeda (unless you believed CIA lies about saddam being mate with osama...then i would LAUGH ON YOU) and so not "danger" to world and finally under an embargo does its politics? NOT AT ALL!

Apophis the Great wrote:I'm not american, I dont give a heck what any of you think of my opinion, I am all for Barack Obama victory, and from what I seen, many white people support him too! (they are not ashamed to support someone who has different skin than them but same ideas than them, and they surely count fact he's black because america needs finally to have a black president considering amount of african american people living there, about time it would be!!)

Accepting your reasoning, it seems to me a female candidate has more merit, as there are distinctly more females living in the USA than there are Afro-Americans.

On the off hand.. one could follow your reasoning, and conclude America needs to have an imbecile as it's president, considering the number of imbeciles living in ANY country, let alone the USA.

It's efficient AS LONG AS SAID PERSON is NOT dangerous to country (seemed to me deadly obvious than I didn't even decided to mention it *SIGH*)...no criminal, stupid, psychopatic, ideologically dangerous person FOR ME IS ACCEPTABLE (dang MANY donnot agree for very last kind of dangerous person...as they don't consider them dangerous...).
Btw I won't comment your point with females having more merit, because I FAIL to see what is wrong thing in it...as long as it's a competant candidate there's no disapproving from my side :p

Okay.. that was labouring the point.

Anyway.
Fred Thompson would be nice.. but I'd rather see him as a VP to McCain. After all, VPs need to enhance the image of the Pres.. kinda like Cheney's done for Bush.

Jack wrote:

Apophis The Great wrote:Elections are one of few reasons I would wish to be american, I'll explain why.
Why? because I would be able to vote there, and such I could proudly can count me in the group of people who stopped the war machine wishing to destroy any muslim country (Iraq, soon Iran?, wondering who's next...probably Pakistan because they become more & more "hard to handle" since assassination of Benazir Bhutto and assaults on Pervez Musharraf's party supporters and other opposition parties, they could become an unstable menace...), by electing the side that represents the best the majority of people, from most poor classes to middle class, which I believe represent like 72-77% of US population.

You may wonder who I talk about?

If you know me, you would be sure of who I mean. I'm in favour of changement, equality and end to old white men holding in presidentship. Afterall, a president represents its country. So...as far as I know, US (or any other) country isn't for sure only composed by white men, I'm all in favour of a representing president, in other words, not necessarly white, but black, "latino", and not necessarly male.

My choice for democrats is maybe because I'm doing school in economy
, so I'm fully aware of problems liberal economy causes. WAY TOO much random results it does.

I'm not american, I dont give a heck what any of you think of my opinion, I am all for Barack Obama victory, and from what I seen, many white people support him too! (they are not ashamed to support someone who has different skin than them but same ideas than them, and they surely count fact he's black because america needs finally to have a black president considering amount of african american people living there, about time it would be!!)

I'll add the userbar to my sig later I believe

For the record, and because you hate it so much. That was just as racist as saying you don't want a black man to be presi, cause he's black. Shaaaaaame

Boo hoo cry me a river I'm white and will build a bridge for you ...and I support a black president.
You've had since 1776 NON STOP white people so STOP THE CRAP PLEEAAAASE!!! A non white will NOT KILL YOUR COUNTRY OH MY GOD!!!
If there's not a support more a black dude than white one it will be always white prez DARE TO DENY IT!!! After first black prez will be elected people will see black or white as same, no need then to promote one.




Anyway

Auriel wrote:teach countries wherever they are what it means to be civilised. If need be, at gunpoint.

Damn straight!
Learning civilization by force THAT IS THE MOST CONTRADICTIONAL AND STUPID THING I EVER HEARD!!! (you forgot? Violence acting considered as not clever people way to do by many people....so...would mean civilizating means "stupiditing" civilizations (IF by violence and barbarism)???) wow that's huge!


Oh yeah, ignore Pops, he's just a rabid democrat fanboy.

Apophis The Great wrote:

Jack wrote:For the record, and because you hate it so much. That was just as racist as saying you don't want a black man to be presi, cause he's black. Shaaaaaame

Boo hoo cry me a river I'm white and will build a bridge for you ...and I support a black president.
You've had since 1776 NON STOP white people so STOP THE CRAP PLEEAAAASE!!! A non white will NOT KILL YOUR COUNTRY OH MY GOD!!!
If there's not a support more a black dude than white one it will be always white prez DARE TO DENY IT!!! After first black prez will be elected people will see black or white as same, no need then to promote one.

Apophis the Great wrote:

Jack wrote:

Auriel wrote:teach countries wherever they are what it means to be civilised. If need be, at gunpoint.

Damn straight!

Learning civilization by force THAT IS THE MOST CONTRADICTIONAL AND STUPID THING I EVER HEARD!!! (you forgot? Violence acting considered as not clever people way to do by many people....so...would mean civilizating means "stupiditing" civilizations (IF by violence and barbarism)???) wow that's huge!

Auriel wrote:Jim, I love you.. and your wonderful manner of presenting your argument.

Apophis The Great wrote:

Jack wrote:For the record, and because you hate it so much. That was just as racist as saying you don't want a black man to be presi, cause he's black. Shaaaaaame

Boo hoo cry me a river I'm white and will build a bridge for you ...and I support a black president.
You've had since 1776 NON STOP white people so STOP THE CRAP PLEEAAAASE!!! A non white will NOT KILL YOUR COUNTRY OH MY GOD!!!
If there's not a support more a black dude than white one it will be always white prez DARE TO DENY IT!!! After first black prez will be elected people will see black or white as same, no need then to promote one.

I believe someone is stuck in the 60's..
Afro-Americans (as you refuse to call them.. tssk, tssk, 'black' = derogatory) are indeed fellow humans. I will never question their mental capacity or their ability to blend into our society, unless they give reason to.
If you want a president that represents gun carrying, uneducated, lower class slum inhabitants, you're free to do so. For the sake of perspective, who pays more taxes? A rich guy, or a schlum? Yea.. the rich guy.
Shouldn't that rich guy have more say in where his tax money goes?
And let us face the facts.. in upper class, rich social groups, most people are indeed elder white males. I daresay they spend more on taxes than an alcoholic on drinks.
Therefore, it is only reasonable that white elder men should represent the tax-paying population. You can have the schlummies represented by anyone you want.. just keep in mind they only CONSUME money, instead of working to produce any.
All in all.. I don't see the problem, and I still stick with the Mac.

You seem to forget they represent minority, and democracy is MEANT to represent majority (dont tell me upper class are majority....I would laugh).
Indeed I prefer to support such guy, because at least HE will TRY TO CHANGE these people in the RIGHT WAY with the RIGHT TOOLS (...if he represents them...which I HIGHLY DOUBT, as I heard VERY FEW afroamerican support Obama, white people are more numbered in Obama electors as far as I heard, white people like me in opinions, I'm sure)

Apophis the Great wrote:

Jack wrote:

Auriel wrote:teach countries wherever they are what it means to be civilised. If need be, at gunpoint.

Damn straight!

Learning civilization by force THAT IS THE MOST CONTRADICTIONAL AND STUPID THING I EVER HEARD!!! (you forgot? Violence acting considered as not clever people way to do by many people....so...would mean civilizating means "stupiditing" civilizations (IF by violence and barbarism)???) wow that's huge!

Sweetheart.. civilisation is simply nothing more but the ability to forcibly act in a manner that isn't natural to humans.
You cannot teach an analphabetic to read, by showing him a book.
Therefore, to educate the lesser people, you'll have to speak their language. Alas.. their language is violence. We will apply this method to ensure the future of the world.. For The Greater Good.
I can't stand the lesser people word, sounds like a white power expression (lesser people being strangely never white ones, not even moronic/stupid/psycho ones).
Meh with Bush actions and his followers/supporters all I see is a soon coming NUCLEAR/CHIMIC WAR and MASS DESTRUCTION of the world, while nuke weapons are used for dissuasion, they would both use it for each of their view to "good of humanity", by cleaning "people who dont deserve to live" (arabs for one side, christians/non extremists for the other one side).
Indeed attacking countries by force will make earth better ...more deficit, more humanity crimes, more hate, more fight...back to primal age


Hail Mac!

((One might interpret some sarcasm in my words.. let it be known, no such sarcasm is intended. I am sticking with my candidate, even if he'll be Pres of a country 4k miles away.))

Certainly you cannot accept that a Woman would become the Most Powerful Man of the World? (Theoretically speaking, I have no problem with that notion myself.)
If that stop moronic war(s) [but not "needed" wars, and donnot bring up crap that iraq war was needed LMAO!!!!!!!] and all crap linked to it directly or undirectly, then, I'm ALL FOR IT!!!

Jack wrote:

Auriel wrote:Jim, I love you.. and your wonderful manner of presenting your argument.

Apophis The Great wrote:

Jack wrote:For the record, and because you hate it so much. That was just as racist as saying you don't want a black man to be presi, cause he's black. Shaaaaaame

Boo hoo cry me a river I'm white and will build a bridge for you ...and I support a black president.
You've had since 1776 NON STOP white people so STOP THE CRAP PLEEAAAASE!!! A non white will NOT KILL YOUR COUNTRY OH MY GOD!!!
If there's not a support more a black dude than white one it will be always white prez DARE TO DENY IT!!! After first black prez will be elected people will see black or white as same, no need then to promote one.

I believe someone is stuck in the 60's..
Afro-Americans (as you refuse to call them.. tssk, tssk, 'black' = derogatory) are indeed fellow humans.

The hell are you talking about? I said nothing of the sort about blacks, and this whole "Black = derogatory" BS, isn't from the 60's, it just started, in the last decade....


I will never question their mental capacity or their ability to blend into our society, unless they give reason to.

Again, where did this come from?


If you want a president that represents gun carrying, uneducated, lower class slum inhabitants, you're free to do so.

The hell? Don't equate everyone whom carries a gun to the stupid poor "slum".

For the sake of perspective, who pays more taxes? A rich guy, or a schlum? Yea.. the rich guy.
Shouldn't that rich guy have more say in where his tax money goes?
And let us face the facts.. in upper class, rich social groups, most people are indeed elder white males. I daresay they spend more on taxes than an alcoholic on drinks.
Therefore, it is only reasonable that white elder men should represent the tax-paying population. You can have the schlummies represented by anyone you want.. just keep in mind they only CONSUME money, instead of working to produce any.
All in all.. I don't see the problem, and I still stick with the Mac.

Are you still talking to me? Were you ever talking to me? I'm so confused. Congratulations not even Pops can confuse me.

Apophis the Great wrote:

Jack wrote:

Auriel wrote:teach countries wherever they are what it means to be civilised. If need be, at gunpoint.

Damn straight!

Learning civilization by force THAT IS THE MOST CONTRADICTIONAL AND STUPID THING I EVER HEARD!!! (you forgot? Violence acting considered as not clever people way to do by many people....so...would mean civilizating means "stupiditing" civilizations (IF by violence and barbarism)???) wow that's huge!

Sweetheart.. civilisation is simply nothing more but the ability to forcibly act in a manner that isn't natural to humans.
You cannot teach an analphabetic to read, by showing him a book.
Therefore, to educate the lesser people, you'll have to speak their language. Alas.. their language is violence. We will apply this method to ensure the future of the world.. For The Greater Good.

Hail Mac!

((One might interpret some sarcasm in my words.. let it be known, no such sarcasm is intended. I am sticking with my candidate, even if he'll be Pres of a country 4k miles away.))

Certainly you cannot accept that a Woman would become the Most Powerful Man of the World? (Theoretically speaking, I have no problem with that notion myself.)