Change is highlighted in yellow italics.
Section 5c.
Abuse / Racism
Members of the SGW community are required to speak courteously to others. Personal attacks on members are not tolerated. This includes comments about one’s sex, gender, skin colour, religion or cultural heritage.
You may not post personal information about another user regardless of how it was obtained. This includes their address, phone numbers, names or any other detail about their real life status that they have not already posted on the SGW forums their selves.
For exceptions to this rule please see the role playing section (section 6.)
Consequence:
Minor infringements such as throw away comments, may be ignored or a polite note from a moderator will be issued requesting the user tone it down. More serious cases will result in the issuing of warning points. Very serious comments will be given more warning points. This will be judged with input from the Ombudsperson, Forum Administrators and Moderators.
Change to Rule Discussion: Abuse / Racism
-
smooshable
- Forum Expert
- Posts: 1278
- Joined: Wed Mar 30, 2005 12:06 am
- ID: 0
- Location: Brisbane, Australia
-
Honours and Awards
Change to Rule Discussion: Abuse / Racism
Indu and proud of it!!
- Clarkey
- Multi Hunter
- Posts: 14366
- Joined: Tue Dec 27, 2005 4:23 am
- ID: 0
- Contact:
-
Honours and Awards
Re: Change to Rule Discussion: Abuse / Racism
I agree with this change. Although it was in green not yellow italics.
- Wolf359
- The Big Bad Admin
- Posts: 5208
- Joined: Sat Feb 19, 2005 2:40 am
- Alliance: EPA
- Race: Tauri
- ID: 0
- Location: Omnipresent
- Contact:
-
Honours and Awards
Re: Change to Rule Discussion: Abuse / Racism
clarkey wrote:I agree with this change. Although it was in green not yellow italics.![]()
agree - and lol at the colour!
However - would suggest that there is an exception clause put in stating that if a user posts their own information within the forum, then said user must accept responsibility that it could then be reproduced elsewhere.
I would also say that the posting of other people's personal info should receive an immediate ban -probably for about 1 month. Some people may find that harsh - I don't - and the way to avoid it is simply not to break the rule.
Mod SpeakSeverian wrote:So I say as a last resort, splice Semper & Wolf359 for a good balance, Clone said unholy abomination a hundred times, let loose on forums and problem solved.
-
Juliette Verified
- The Queen
- Posts: 31802
- Joined: Sun Feb 06, 2005 6:57 pm
- Race: Royalty
- ID: 4323
- Alternate name(s): Cersei Lannister
- Location: Ultima Thule
Re: Change to Rule Discussion: Abuse / Racism
Agreed with Wolf on the immediate ban result.
One is more subtle when a hand is raised to spank you..
One is more subtle when a hand is raised to spank you..

- Legendary Apophis
- Forum History
- Posts: 13681
- Joined: Tue Jun 14, 2005 12:54 pm
- Alliance: Generations
- Race: System Lord
- ID: 7889
- Alternate name(s): Apophis the Great
- Location: Ha'TaK
Re: Change to Rule Discussion: Abuse / Racism
Agreed, this is not the Europol database here, we haven't to know everyone's address and private infos without their knowledge! 

Spoiler
Incarnate - LG - LG1 - LG2 - LG3 - LG4 - AG - EAG ~ AGoL - Completed
Spoiler
<Dmonix> Damnit Jim how come every conversation with you always ends up discussing something deep and meaningful?
<Dmonix> We always end up discussing male/female differences or politics or football
<Dmonix> All the really important issues in life
<Dmonix> We always end up discussing male/female differences or politics or football
<Dmonix> All the really important issues in life
-
Tanith
- Forum Regular
- Posts: 697
- Joined: Sun Nov 19, 2006 4:08 pm
- Race: Ancient
- ID: 86581
- Location: USA
-
Nimras
- Forum Addict
- Posts: 3548
- Joined: Mon Sep 04, 2006 6:27 am
- Alliance: Yggdrasil
- Race: Viking
- ID: 30667
- Location: Farum, Denmark
Re: Change to Rule Discussion: Abuse / Racism
I agrea but why not instead of a month ban make it 2 if not 3. Basicly make it showing we do not want this.
And if a player has posted their own info then i agrea then they should accept if others post it.
And if a player has posted their own info then i agrea then they should accept if others post it.

-
smooshable
- Forum Expert
- Posts: 1278
- Joined: Wed Mar 30, 2005 12:06 am
- ID: 0
- Location: Brisbane, Australia
-
Honours and Awards
Re: Change to Rule Discussion: Abuse / Racism
I appreciate the enthusiasm guys but let's not get carried away.
Indu and proud of it!!
-
thaltek
- Spamity Spam In A Can
- Posts: 20465
- Joined: Sun Jun 25, 2006 6:19 pm
- Location: chicago's nether region
Re: Change to Rule Discussion: Abuse / Racism
so this rule would make any form of my "i know too much about you but keep getting it wrong spam" won't be tollarated...?!!?
ex....
..................................................................
name *******/ joe inmy shoe!
phone: 1-800-*insert your phone number here*
location: eyebrow, west dakota
isp: 192.168.1.1
gender: blue
...................................................................
if you don't understand the isp joke don't even bother posting about it....
ex....
..................................................................
name *******/ joe inmy shoe!
phone: 1-800-*insert your phone number here*
location: eyebrow, west dakota
isp: 192.168.1.1
gender: blue
...................................................................
if you don't understand the isp joke don't even bother posting about it....
-
Biscuit
- The Crumbly One
- Posts: 5559
- Joined: Wed Sep 20, 2006 5:35 am
- ID: 0
Re: Change to Rule Discussion: Abuse / Racism
thaltek wrote:so this rule would make any form of my "i know too much about you but keep getting it wrong spam" won't be tollarated...?!!?
ex....
..................................................................
name *******/ joe inmy shoe!
phone: 1-800-*insert your phone number here*
location: eyebrow, west dakota
isp: 192.168.1.1
gender: blue
...................................................................
if you don't understand the isp joke don't even bother posting about it....
Anyway.. whoever would be (for use of a word that doesn't make me seem condescending) regardless enough to share such information online deserves whatever happens.
And as Smoosh said.. don't get carried away. A normal ban would be sufficient enough and maybe after repeated offenses a longer ban would be put in place.



-
thaltek
- Spamity Spam In A Can
- Posts: 20465
- Joined: Sun Jun 25, 2006 6:19 pm
- Location: chicago's nether region
Re: Change to Rule Discussion: Abuse / Racism
thank you bix....
- Wolf359
- The Big Bad Admin
- Posts: 5208
- Joined: Sat Feb 19, 2005 2:40 am
- Alliance: EPA
- Race: Tauri
- ID: 0
- Location: Omnipresent
- Contact:
-
Honours and Awards
Re: Change to Rule Discussion: Abuse / Racism
smooshable wrote:I appreciate the enthusiasm guys but let's not get carried away.
What do you mean by that smoosh?
Mod SpeakSeverian wrote:So I say as a last resort, splice Semper & Wolf359 for a good balance, Clone said unholy abomination a hundred times, let loose on forums and problem solved.
- Clarkey
- Multi Hunter
- Posts: 14366
- Joined: Tue Dec 27, 2005 4:23 am
- ID: 0
- Contact:
-
Honours and Awards
Re: Change to Rule Discussion: Abuse / Racism
Wolf359 wrote:smooshable wrote:I appreciate the enthusiasm guys but let's not get carried away.
What do you mean by that smoosh?
I think he's referring to people suggesting 2 to 3 months ban.
-
thaltek
- Spamity Spam In A Can
- Posts: 20465
- Joined: Sun Jun 25, 2006 6:19 pm
- Location: chicago's nether region
Re: Change to Rule Discussion: Abuse / Racism
perhaps it would be easier to paint the walls white, give everybody a lobotomy, and give the place a nice disinfecting wash down.
-
Tanith
- Forum Regular
- Posts: 697
- Joined: Sun Nov 19, 2006 4:08 pm
- Race: Ancient
- ID: 86581
- Location: USA
Re: Change to Rule Discussion: Abuse / Racism
thaltek wrote:perhaps it would be easier to paint the walls white, give everybody a lobotomy, and give the place a nice disinfecting wash down.
I like his idea!
Mod Color






