This was just a rough draft I came up with in 10mins
Much like the alliance war suggested. I think players should be able to declare a 1vs1 war with someone.
I would like some suggestions to how this would be worked out who would win.
I was personally thinking.
-If you enter a 1vs1 war you can't ppt unless you decide to quit the 1vs1 war.
-No nox
-War lasts until someone clicks the button of surrendering
-If you go into preg you automatically lose
I thinking the person who declares the 1vs1 sets the terms of surrender, then the other person can accept or reject.
Please post other suggestions in here.
1vs1 wars
-
dazman
- Forum Elite
- Posts: 1954
- Joined: Sun Dec 11, 2005 12:59 pm
- ID: 0
- Location: Canada
1vs1 wars
Trade feedback thread~disturbed_one wrote:its a war game so if by us massing random peeps ruins the game for them then maybe they should go play with barbi dolls
http://stargatewars.herebegames.com/vie ... 48&t=70898
- Z E R O
- Forum Addict
- Posts: 3908
- Joined: Fri Nov 30, 2007 11:04 am
- Alliance: Jötunheim
- Race: NanoTiMaster
- ID: 1918344
- Alternate name(s): Hymir
- Location: Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Re: 1vs1 wars
I think the player fleeing to pergatory should automatically lose the war, but I think there should be such a thing as pergatory war, and going to main realm means the same effect..

Z E R O - Jötunheim - 1907332 - UnKnown of the TOLAH

*Zero - 1991093
Spoiler

-
dazman
- Forum Elite
- Posts: 1954
- Joined: Sun Dec 11, 2005 12:59 pm
- ID: 0
- Location: Canada
Re: 1vs1 wars
Z E R O wrote:I think the player fleeing to pergatory should automatically lose the war, but I think there should be such a thing as pergatory war, and going to main realm means the same effect..
Yep already said
-If you go into preg you automatically lose
Trade feedback thread~disturbed_one wrote:its a war game so if by us massing random peeps ruins the game for them then maybe they should go play with barbi dolls
http://stargatewars.herebegames.com/vie ... 48&t=70898
- Z E R O
- Forum Addict
- Posts: 3908
- Joined: Fri Nov 30, 2007 11:04 am
- Alliance: Jötunheim
- Race: NanoTiMaster
- ID: 1918344
- Alternate name(s): Hymir
- Location: Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Re: 1vs1 wars
dazman wrote:Z E R O wrote:I think the player fleeing to pergatory should automatically lose the war, but I think there should be such a thing as pergatory war, and going to main realm means the same effect..
Yep already said-If you go into preg you automatically lose
Yeah I was agreeing, and then adding to it.

Z E R O - Jötunheim - 1907332 - UnKnown of the TOLAH

*Zero - 1991093
Spoiler

-
dazman
- Forum Elite
- Posts: 1954
- Joined: Sun Dec 11, 2005 12:59 pm
- ID: 0
- Location: Canada
Re: 1vs1 wars
LOl ok 
Trade feedback thread~disturbed_one wrote:its a war game so if by us massing random peeps ruins the game for them then maybe they should go play with barbi dolls
http://stargatewars.herebegames.com/vie ... 48&t=70898
- chargin
- Forum Intermediate
- Posts: 820
- Joined: Sat Feb 17, 2007 3:45 pm
- ID: 0
Re: 1vs1 wars
need to build at least 5 times both players average UP/income worth of resources into defence within 12hrs of the war starting and within 12hrs of it being destroyed. If you can't destroy the enemies def within 12hrs of it being build then you lose and lose every unit you currently have in attack and defence. Can only have a personal war every 2 weeks.

I say smart things so people don't realize how dumb i am.
- GeneralChaos
- Forum Addict
- Posts: 3421
- Joined: Wed Aug 16, 2006 3:56 pm
- Alliance: Omega
- ID: 59627
Re: 1vs1 wars
dazman wrote:This was just a rough draft I came up with in 10mins
Much like the alliance war suggested. I think players should be able to declare a 1vs1 war with someone.
I would like some suggestions to how this would be worked out who would win.
I was personally thinking.
-If you enter a 1vs1 war you can't ppt unless you decide to quit the 1vs1 war.
-No nox
-War lasts until someone clicks the button of surrendering
-If you go into preg you automatically lose
I thinking the person who declares the 1vs1 sets the terms of surrender, then the other person can accept or reject.
Please post other suggestions in here.
Sadly you will still have the problem where some people are just all mouth and will have nothing to destroy, and will just sit there forever hitting away at you and stopping you from playing the game the way you want, a little like the whole sniper problem.
Deep within Noob Cave, you find a strange pool filled with a glowing blue liquid. You think back to what your mother told you about unfamiliar liquids found in caves.
You're pretty sure she said "Drink it! What's the worst that can happen?"
You're pretty sure she said "Drink it! What's the worst that can happen?"
-
Colos
- The Ascended
- Posts: 1132
- Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2007 4:54 am
- Alliance: None
- Race: Human
- ID: 0
- Location: Hungary, and proud of it
Re: 1vs1 wars
Wat about this...if you don't build a certain amount of def/covert etc, you lose... 
Colos
Colos



Spoiler
Jason... wrote:FixxedColos wrote:I was a God, too.
-
dardar
- Forum Regular
- Posts: 695
- Joined: Thu Oct 19, 2006 12:52 pm
- Alliance: pure poison
- Race: nanotimaster
- ID: 0
- Location: usa
-
dazman
- Forum Elite
- Posts: 1954
- Joined: Sun Dec 11, 2005 12:59 pm
- ID: 0
- Location: Canada
Re: 1vs1 wars
Colos wrote:Wat about this...if you don't build a certain amount of def/covert etc, you lose...
Colos
Yea, but I don't know how that would be implanted in.
Trade feedback thread~disturbed_one wrote:its a war game so if by us massing random peeps ruins the game for them then maybe they should go play with barbi dolls
http://stargatewars.herebegames.com/vie ... 48&t=70898
- repli**cator
- Forum Intermediate
- Posts: 848
- Joined: Thu May 18, 2006 3:39 pm
- Alliance: SOLO
- Race: RepliTiMaster
- ID: 65108
- Alternate name(s): makanko
~mak~ - Location: Belgium
Re: 1vs1 wars
yeh i'd say any realm-changing will be surrendering.
also i think ppl under 20M army size should always play 1on1 in purg. (no traiding, no help, not too many turns (->skill), now that's a 1on1)
i would even go as far as no trading allowed (but i suppose ppl can't do jack without their unlimited turn acquiring
)
[quote=Chargin]
need to build at least 5 times both players average UP/income worth of resources into defence within 12hrs of the war starting and within 12hrs of it being destroyed. If you can't destroy the enemies def within 12hrs of it being build then you lose and lose every unit you currently have in attack and defence. Can only have a personal war every 2 weeks.[/quote]
well would that include planets/officers (this would change if planets/officers were also targeted)
also do you mean the average UP/income would be calculated on both players (what i mean is, if i had 20K UP/1B income and my adversary 100K UP/10B income, would i have to build defense worth 5x (60K UP/5B income)?
because that would set the bigger player (who's already got an advantage) even at a higher plane
also i think ppl under 20M army size should always play 1on1 in purg. (no traiding, no help, not too many turns (->skill), now that's a 1on1)
i would even go as far as no trading allowed (but i suppose ppl can't do jack without their unlimited turn acquiring
[quote=Chargin]
need to build at least 5 times both players average UP/income worth of resources into defence within 12hrs of the war starting and within 12hrs of it being destroyed. If you can't destroy the enemies def within 12hrs of it being build then you lose and lose every unit you currently have in attack and defence. Can only have a personal war every 2 weeks.[/quote]
well would that include planets/officers (this would change if planets/officers were also targeted)
also do you mean the average UP/income would be calculated on both players (what i mean is, if i had 20K UP/1B income and my adversary 100K UP/10B income, would i have to build defense worth 5x (60K UP/5B income)?
because that would set the bigger player (who's already got an advantage) even at a higher plane
POWER to the repli/nanoti !
Role Playing
"Be sure brain is engaged before putting mouth in gear"
Role Playing
"Be sure brain is engaged before putting mouth in gear"
