Fallout,
I don`t have any issues with you nor with other mod except for this unfair warning. How you interpret my wording, does not change the fact that you have no solid reason for giving me a warning.
Your attack method to my complain to defend your issued warning, since i have proved that there is no rule against calling someone scammer is to motivate that my post was spam. I will quote the rules in this case too.
Section 4: Spam
b. Replies
Replies will be considered spam if they do not contribute to the discussion of the topic. This may include off topic posting or an excessive number of posts that contain nothing more than emoticons or small words such as ‘lol’. While it is appropriate to indicate something is amusing, drowning out a whole thread with such posts makes it hard to follow for all users.
Consequence:
A polite note from a moderator will be issued requesting the user cut down the amount of irrelevant posts. Repeat offenders will be given one warning point.
While my post indeed did not contribuited for your sale because it was actually an warning for a possible scam it was relevant to the topic since it presented vital information about your account, or at least the account that i thought to be yours since it had/has you name. There were no other excesive posts, no verbal abuses from me. In fact the only person who abused from this was Fallout. He abused his mod status and asked me to apologise for something that I felt no need to, or else... well this is the reaction for his action (conclusion).
Long wording made short: Fallout abused his mod status to aquire an umotivated apologise and when that was not given, the warning has been issued with the motivation that he posted:
calling a mod scammer with no proof seems a good warning reason to me. thank you for posting
Also, to spice things up a bit, notice his last wording: "thank you for posting". He was thrilled that he had at least one post to have me warned. That is not a reaction from a mod, who has to be impartial. To quote
the role of a mod (made by Forum, it is older than the new rules but they still apply):
3) mods will mod the forum. they will NOT comment on the right/wrong of specific views, ingame actions, inforum comments directed at others, inforum comments directed at themselves, or any other specifics. In short, it is not to be their job to pass opinion.
4) mods WILL mod the forum. they can edit/delete/ban/move topics, users and posts.
By issuing this warning, by his attitude in the PM after the warning was issued, by harasing a forum user to obtain a public apologise, by not knowing the rules that he has to apply, Fallout has surpassed his mod status, his impartiality towards all the users. I see plenty of reasons to have his activity as a moderator investigated by the forum admins and this will be my next legal attack against him after this issue will be resolved.
To strenghten furthermore my next step, i will quote Fallout (posted above this post):
seems like everyone has eaten up his and his friends propaganda so im done with this issue.
whatever the decision will be, im sure he will continue to verbally attack me in the future.
So don't be surprised if in the future another mod gets attacked by ridiculous claims cause he might have been trouble to some certain ppl.
This is his response to a complaint from a forum user that felt that was unrightfully punished. There is no propaganda, there are no friends to sustain "my propaganda", i am not part of and not in need of any propaganda to sustain my cause. I follow the rules. I know then rules and when i break them, i break them on purpose but suffer the consequences with dignity (which i did in January when was the last time when i was suspended: for spam [and btw it seems that my warnings from then were not reseted and now my counter in the personal control pannel shows a warning level of 5, when it should be 1 with this unfair warning] - you see Fallout, i was never accused/warned/suspended for verbally atacks against any forum user, i never did that nor will I ever do it outside the galactic colosseum where roleplaying is permitted). The only person to use propaganda for his defense is you, but i will not continue this argument, it is just an observation.
I've sent you a ingame pm but was told you don't read them by a friend today. 
[/url]
