Page 1 of 2
Clarkey
Posted: Mon Sep 28, 2009 9:56 am
by Doc
Clarkey wrote:Doc wrote:my names are:
i
fake
a
coma
for
the
lulz
ha
k
because they are special in my heart
You really are a loser. A parasite on these forums.
hmm. im thinking thats against teh rulz.
Re: Clarkey
Posted: Mon Sep 28, 2009 9:58 am
by deni
Doc wrote:Clarkey wrote:Doc wrote:my names are:
i
fake
a
coma
for
the
lulz
ha
k
because they are special in my heart
You really are a loser. A parasite on these forums.
hmm. im thinking thats against teh rulz.
Then use the report function.
Re: Clarkey
Posted: Mon Sep 28, 2009 10:01 am
by deni
Mikgamer wrote:True or not any normal user would get a warning for a post like that. I hope some positive come out of this for once.
I disagree. I would not have given out a warning for a post like that.
Re: Clarkey
Posted: Mon Sep 28, 2009 10:04 am
by Rocky
i would not give a warning for that, and tbh Doc some of the things you have said are appalling. That was next to harmless what Clarkey said.
Re: Clarkey
Posted: Mon Sep 28, 2009 10:05 am
by Doc
what clarkey said was 5x worse than what i called universe.
a
wait for it
coma girl
OMG the world's gone crazy. he said COMA.
k
whilst clarkey said what? parasite, loser etc
i either want my warning removed or clarkey gets one. not a verbal a warning
edit: what have i said than Rocky. find quotes and prove its worse.
Re: Clarkey
Posted: Mon Sep 28, 2009 10:08 am
by Doc
SuperSaiyan wrote:Doc wrote:i either want my warning removed or clarkey gets one. not a verbal a warning
he is not the only one that verbal warning is for, it pertains to all those whom were spamming that thread, you would then be asking for a warning yourself?
who said i was talking about spamming.
1) no warning for calling universe coma girl
2) he personal insulted me thats against forum rules
thats inconsistancy with foruming between SS and rocky.
Re: Clarkey
Posted: Mon Sep 28, 2009 10:09 am
by Q Man
doesn't seem to warrant a warning.
but posting it here is no help and
Doc wrote:what clarkey said was 5x worse than what i called universe.
a
wait for it
coma girl
OMG the world's gone crazy. he said COMA.
k
whilst clarkey said what? parasite, loser etc
i either want my warning removed or clarkey gets one. not a verbal a warning
edit: what have i said than Rocky. find quotes and prove its worse.
and yo do know us moderators can still find all removed posts, i've seen some of the stuff you got warned for, it was worse.
SuperSaiyan wrote:Doc wrote:i either want my warning removed or clarkey gets one. not a verbal a warning
he is not the only one that verbal warning is for, it pertains to all those whom were spamming that thread, you would then be asking for a warning yourself?
Doc, thats not how the rules work, you deserved your warning.
Re: Clarkey
Posted: Mon Sep 28, 2009 10:10 am
by Doc
SuperSaiyan wrote:I don't care what you were talking about, I removed the SPAM, for that a public warning was issued...
again, im talking about a different topic.
thats inconsistancy in foruming. clarkey did 10x worse than me.
1) i got no spoken warning
2) clarkey did
Re: Clarkey
Posted: Mon Sep 28, 2009 10:11 am
by minisaiyan
perhaps you didnt think, maybe someone close to clarkey has been, or is in a coma. maybe you wouldn't like some "joking" about something liike that if u were in the same situation.
Re: Clarkey
Posted: Mon Sep 28, 2009 10:11 am
by Doc
@qman find it then
i was only warned for calling universe coma girl thanks.
and why are you posting in this thread?
so it should work like that. its bias basically
Re: Clarkey
Posted: Mon Sep 28, 2009 10:12 am
by Doc
Aesthetics of Hate wrote:perhaps you didnt think, maybe someone close to clarkey has been, or is in a coma. maybe you wouldn't like some "joking" about something liike that if u were in the same situation.
my problem because?
universe shouldn't have faked it in the first place.
k
Re: Clarkey
Posted: Mon Sep 28, 2009 10:14 am
by Clarkey
FAO: Ombudsman - I did receive a verbal warning which I am happy to accept. It was handled in the correct manner. As you can see my User Notes show no previous warnings and not previous Notes indicating previous verbal warnings. Usually incases like that a verbal warning is given unless in extreme circumstances.
Doc's User Notes however tell a different story and has today gone out of his way to create such an issue from failing to adhere to the sig rule, using the sig rule to mock forum staff, and insulting people. Doc's first verbal warning was given to him regarding the sig rule. He failed to comply to it. I have not failed to comply to my verbal warning.
Thank you for taking the time to read my input in to this Ombudsman.
Re: Clarkey
Posted: Mon Sep 28, 2009 10:15 am
by zeekomkommer
hey,
now what clarkey said are strong words and as forum admin he should be a rollmodel for the forum user. however they are not entirely against the rules. he didn't realy go off flamming and gravlyinsulting, all his insults were aimed @ your forum persona and not you as a person.
however with that said it doesn't realy belong on the forum and has thus been removed by a moderator. the moderator descided to issue a verbal warning. this means if clarkey posts something simular again he will get warned for it.
even tough he is an admin everyone here is just human and still has alot to learn on a personal level. this includes slips of the tongue and 'tantrums'. so therefor i believe the mod action was correct. how other mods react to other cases is irrelivant here since here we work on a case to case basis wih the facts about this complaint. if users don't agree with getting a warning for a simular post then they are welcome in my home and then we'll work togheter to find a solution to the problem.
you can however give me other arguments wich might change my mind, hence why i'm leaving this topic open for discussion but do note, as ombudsman i cannot give warnings for anything that happens out of my section, that is a call only forum moderators deligated to that section can make
Re: Clarkey
Posted: Mon Sep 28, 2009 10:17 am
by Rocky
for all interested its in Doc's profile and the dump,
Doc, how can you possibly justify that?, rl insults are against the forums rules, i don't care if you call someone a crappy masser, a pathetic poster or a parasite on the forums, that is not a rl insult, what you said is.
edit zeek explained it better.
Re: Clarkey
Posted: Mon Sep 28, 2009 10:17 am
by Doc
my 2nd warning never got a warning for just a straight waring for calling her a coma girl
and i mis understood what SS said i though he only wanted the pictures less than 450px in height. as he was talking about the images not the text. lol
idc about what you have done. this isn't consistant modding
thanks
@ zeek
im not compalinging he didn't get a warning im complaining against Rocky not giving me a verbal warning before, and only giving me a warning for calling her coma. so i should only have a verbal warning
thanks