StarGateWars Forums

What Now? Seen on radar by thousands (last year 2010) over Australia.
What is going on?
Anonymous details sent to Colin Andrews. Official that HAARP ramped up.

January 22, 2010.
Colin Andrews



http://www.colinandrews.net/Cloud-Radar ... -0116.html



Just to make sure this isn't derailed outright:-

http://www.carnicom.com/radar1.htm
http://www.carnicom.com/rad0620.htm
http://www.carnicom.com/rad0501.htm
http://www.carnicom.com/rad0530.htm
http://www.carnicom.com/rad0429.htm

Let the fun begin...

how come ive never even heard of this before????

also, those photos are shopped, badly
no other cloud on those pics looks like that (colour or consistency)
and dont get me started on the fact that anything in the sky that large wouldnt retain its shape for more than a few minutes

Shopped?

Did you look at the other links at the bottom of the first post.

Your an Australian & you haven't heard of this!!!

Well looks like your media & government is hiding this from you...

Are you suprised...?

Alpha13snake wrote:Shopped?

Did you look at the other links at the bottom of the first post.

Your an Australian & you haven't heard of this!!!

Well looks like your media & government is hiding this from you...

Are you suprised...?

Is any government in the world not hiding something as for Australian Government hiding things that no national secret as for HARP I do not think conspiracy sites to me never qualify enough as prof.

Removed

Kit-Fox wrote:HAARP is only a research project.

Are you so sure:-

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=62ZtPqfvpu8 Jesse on HAARP...

Kit-Fox wrote:The aim hopefully is to find someway to avert hurricanes and similar such destructive weather patterns either by dissipating them totally or moving/diverting them away from/or towards human settlements.

Sounds like it could quite easily be a weapon...

Alpha13snake wrote:

Kit-Fox wrote:HAARP is only a research project.

Are you so sure:-

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=62ZtPqfvpu8 Jesse on HAARP...

Kit-Fox wrote:The aim hopefully is to find someway to avert hurricanes and similar such destructive weather patterns either by dissipating them totally or moving/diverting them away from/or towards human settlements.

Sounds like it could quite easily be a weapon...

Jesse Ventura is probably close to the farthest you could get from a credible source. He's insane. I lived in Minnesota when he was Governor also.

Alpha13snake wrote:Shopped?

Did you look at the other links at the bottom of the first post.

Your an Australian & you haven't heard of this!!!

Well looks like your media & government is hiding this from you...

Are you suprised...?

i dont know about america, but australia has the Bureu of Meteorology that distributes the satellite images, weather predictions and disaster warnings for australia, and nowhere there did i see a BOM logo on those radar images, which means that its either an external satellite (not likely considering that australia isnt exactly a nation that needs watching by the US or the EU (the only two powers who have the space agencies to conduct such monitoring, which would not include weather monitoring)


and if i want to 'find out the truth' about 'what really happens' in australia, then i would watch A Current Affair or Today Tonight, both of which are nonsense-spouting excuse for news (e.g. the apparent 'escaped puma' stalking sydney, of which no solid photo can be found, nor a reliable witness)

Ĕɱƿŷ wrote:Jesse Ventura is probably close to the farthest you could get from a credible source. He's insane. I lived in Minnesota when he was Governor also.

Is that your professional opinion? What evidence do you have to make a broad, sweeping statement like that...?

Jesse isn't the source of the information, he is the presenter of said information.

Again another attack on Jesse, when it really isn't the issue.

Alpha13snake wrote:

Ĕɱƿŷ wrote:Jesse Ventura is probably close to the farthest you could get from a credible source. He's insane. I lived in Minnesota when he was Governor also.

Is that your professional opinion? What evidence do you have to make a broad, sweeping statement like that...?

Jesse isn't the source of the information, he is the presenter of said information.

Again another attack on Jesse, when it really isn't the issue.

Ya it's not really the discussion, I have no comment on HAARP because I have literally no background information on it. I just felt the need to make a side comment on him. I have no evidence and care to gather none, as I am not a psychologist nor do I have a report from one who examined him. In my personal opinion, any information he presents can't be trusted because he will believe any conspiracy theory, founded or otherwise.

No further comment though, as this is about HAARP.

Ĕɱƿŷ wrote:In my personal opinion, any information he presents can't be trusted because he will believe any conspiracy theory, founded or otherwise.

Surely you would have to know him in person to say "He will believe any conspiracy theory".

Actually I find his subjects to be parts of a bigger picture.

Why even bother posting if you have no intentions of commenting on the actual topic at hand.

HAARP is not one of a kind, besides HAARP the 5 other most known are
1) Mu Radar – 1 megawatt facility in Japan (34°51'14.80"N 136° 6'19.45"E).

2) Arecibo Observatory – 2 megawatt facility in Puerto Rico (18°20'38.97"N 66°45'9.77"W).

3) HIPAS – 70 megawatt facility east of Fairbanks, Alaska (64°52'21.18"N 146°50'18.78"W).

4) Sura – 190 megawatt facility in central Russia (56° 7'10.32"N 46° 2'4.41"E).

5) EISCAT – 1 gigawatt facility in Tromsø, Northern Norway (69°35'1.06"N 19°12'57.11"E).

I have yet to see any proof that HAARP or related facilities do control/create weather, but there are certainly a lot of scientists and others that would debate that and I don't rule it out as a possibility. Although a lot of research has been shown with the possibility of the types of radio and microwave frequencies these facilities can produce. Here is a declassified document

Removed

KF, how sure are you that weather weapons are not being used, or are impractical?

If that is indeed what you are saying?



Both of those are genuine questions and are not meant to be anything other than genuine

[KMA]Avenger wrote:KF, how sure are you that weather weapons are not being used, or are impractical?

If that is indeed what you are saying?



Both of those are genuine questions and are not meant to be anything other than genuine

If they are being used they are only allowed to operate in their own country. At least you would assume this because of the UN 1976 Weather Weapon Treaty. But the question was not for me