Unfair Warning Issued by Inept Mod

[Ĕɱƿŷ]

Well I can't post it again but let's say this mod thinks that there is something wrong with sodomy and decided to warn me for essentially mentioning this word. I would like my warning to be revoked and an apology to be made to me and all the people in the community for wasting their time.

[[BoT] Jason]

Proof and quote said warning, just maybe to help your witch hunt

[Ĕɱƿŷ]

If I post it I'd get a warning

[[BoT] Jason]

Post the warning as quoted in PM to you and just remove the bit thats warnable so that the oms atleast gets an idea as to what you're going on about

[Ĕɱƿŷ]

"The following is a warning which has been issued to you by an administrator or moderator of this site.
Quote:
This is a warning regarding the following post made by you: viewtopic.php?f=49&p=2364667#p2364667 .

Edited the post after it was Modded. Then proceeded to quote it and respond directly to the mod."

[Juliette]

That's not a warning for 'sodomy'..

[Ĕɱƿŷ]

It's been editted by the mod, but the mod decided that his own personal, biased opinion was better than the law of Dubai. I guess that's why he/she lost the race to become crown prince....

[Juliette]

It's been editted by the mod, but the mod decided that his own personal, biased opinion was better than the law of Dubai. I guess that's why he/she lost the race to become crown prince....

Yes. Are you contesting the *warning* you got for "protesting against a moderator" or the verbal warning you got for "racism".
I'm not saying "roll over and accept it", but I am curious which warning you're fighting.

[Ĕɱƿŷ]

Whatever I was actually warned for. I assume because the mod in question can't get her strap-on up so she has to do whatever it takes which for some reason involves unjust warnings.

[Zeratul]

Psyko is a good mod... She has no need of you attempting to insult her.

[Legendary Apophis]

Why would the mod be necessarily inept just because they warned you?

[Juliette]

Psyko is a good mod... She has no need of you attempting to insult her.

Technically, he's right though.
But yes. Psyko is a good mod. The issue is not with Psyko's warning, but with Jason's verbal warning leading up to it.

[Ĕɱƿŷ]

Nooo! The issue is with the actual warning. Whoever verbal warned me told me to 'sugar coat' what I was already sugar coating. Which I did but apparently someone wasn't getting any at home so they had to come here to the forum to get their sweet taste of.......

[[BoT] Jason]

Nooo! The issue is with the actual warning. Whoever verbal warned me told me to 'sugar coat' what I was already sugar coating. Which I did but apparently someone wasn't getting any at home so they had to come here to the forum to get their sweet taste of.......

True I did so, but then in your sugar coated coating you publicly addressed a mod concerning a verbal warning in the wrong section which falls under moderator respect
[spoiler]

Section 9: Moderator Respect
Users are required to be respectful while addressing moderators who are acting in an official capacity. Moderators are likewise expected to be respectful to users while operating in an official capacity. Moderators will get no special treatment while posting as a user. If one party ceases to be respectful, that does NOT give the other party the liberty to respond with disrespect.

This extends to private messages and reports. If you message a staff member with demands or insults, or if you file a report with demands or insults, it will not be acceptable and may be ignored.

Consequence:
Users who are disrespectful to moderators or staff members will receive a verbal warning. Repeat offenders will receive one warning point. Issues about Moderators being disrespectful will be handled internally.

[/spoiler]

[Ĕɱƿŷ]

That says repeat offenders, I never offended any mod in the first place but I guess if a mod is so inconsistent when it comes to following the rules then I wouldn't expect to have any rights.