i suggest that where it is 24 hour to vac before u ppt
make allience ppt and black market ppt reset the count so u have to wait 24 hours
vac ppt suggestion
-
- Forum Expert
- Posts: 1025
- Joined: Tue Jan 01, 2008 12:58 pm
- Race: System Lord
- ID: 44650
- Location: Round the corner
- jedi~tank
- Forum Zombie
- Posts: 9936
- Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2007 12:43 pm
- ID: 0
- Location: Creepin in the back door
Re: vac ppt suggestion
I believe that happens now.
"What I want to see is a tight knit group not a collection of people pulling in different directions"
Deni
-
- Forum Expert
- Posts: 1025
- Joined: Tue Jan 01, 2008 12:58 pm
- Race: System Lord
- ID: 44650
- Location: Round the corner
- jedi~tank
- Forum Zombie
- Posts: 9936
- Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2007 12:43 pm
- ID: 0
- Location: Creepin in the back door
Re: vac ppt suggestion
Gandy 181 wrote:nope
u can ppt all the way to vac
ask rodwolf
I have tried it, whether I used a market or alliance ppt and it wouldnt let me. I dont think we need to change the game again because of 1 player or 1 alliances insistance to mass 1 player do you? This is becoming idiotic.
"What I want to see is a tight knit group not a collection of people pulling in different directions"
Deni
- Lord-RahL
- Forum Expert
- Posts: 1115
- Joined: Thu Jun 30, 2005 6:10 pm
- jedi~tank
- Forum Zombie
- Posts: 9936
- Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2007 12:43 pm
- ID: 0
- Location: Creepin in the back door
Re: vac ppt suggestion
SuperSaiyan wrote:BM PPTs, I agree.
They are PPTs you choose to take just the same.
Alliance ones though, not so sure.
Those are not voluntary and could really screw people over.
I thought atm alliance ones had to wear off before going on vac, but not a 24hr limit. Thats as far as I'd go for those. Other PPTs though I do agree (aside from admin given, again if you didn't opt for it it shouldn't count)
I agree, but once again trying to change game mechanics just so I can mass a player is stupid
"What I want to see is a tight knit group not a collection of people pulling in different directions"
Deni
- jedi~tank
- Forum Zombie
- Posts: 9936
- Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2007 12:43 pm
- ID: 0
- Location: Creepin in the back door
Re: vac ppt suggestion
SuperSaiyan wrote:Jedi~Tank wrote:SuperSaiyan wrote:BM PPTs, I agree.
They are PPTs you choose to take just the same.
Alliance ones though, not so sure.
Those are not voluntary and could really screw people over.
I thought atm alliance ones had to wear off before going on vac, but not a 24hr limit. Thats as far as I'd go for those. Other PPTs though I do agree (aside from admin given, again if you didn't opt for it it shouldn't count)
I agree, but once again trying to change game mechanics just so I can mass a player is stupid
Yes it is, but changing them so they make sense is not so stupid
I don't care too much about a motive so long as the end result is something that is beneficial ^_^
I agree..but as I said I do believe this already happens..I can recall trying to vac right after a black market uu purchase and couldnt, as well as trying to vac following an alliance ppt, I had to wait 24hours each time.
"What I want to see is a tight knit group not a collection of people pulling in different directions"
Deni
-
- Forum Expert
- Posts: 1025
- Joined: Tue Jan 01, 2008 12:58 pm
- Race: System Lord
- ID: 44650
- Location: Round the corner
Re: vac ppt suggestion
It's not the class u can buy black market ones alway to vac
And it's not just to mass one person u fool it's a flaw so it should be sorted
And it's not just to mass one person u fool it's a flaw so it should be sorted
-
- Goa'uld
- Posts: 1480
- Joined: Fri Sep 08, 2006 7:02 am
- ID: 0
Re: vac ppt suggestion
SuperSaiyan wrote:BM PPTs, I agree.
They are PPTs you choose to take just the same.
Alliance ones though, not so sure.
Those are not voluntary and could really screw people over.
I thought atm alliance ones had to wear off before going on vac, but not a 24hr limit. Thats as far as I'd go for those. Other PPTs though I do agree (aside from admin given, again if you didn't opt for it it shouldn't count)
Agreed. Last time I went on vacation mode (I think it was the last time, but I can't even remember how long ago exactly it was), the alliance PPT was set without any prior warning the day I was supposed to leave town, and I was afraid I'd have to stay out for a few days, with no way of logging in to save my def from slowly being massed away by farmers. It didn't happen, and I was happy it didn't.
Gone, left, no longer here.
- ~phalax~
- Forum Regular
- Posts: 684
- Joined: Wed Jan 14, 2009 5:04 pm
- Alliance: Omegan Empire
- Race: Omegan Monkey
- Location: New Zealand
Re: vac ppt suggestion
I totally agree with Gandy, makes 0 sense having a rule for one PPT and not others.
-
- Forum Addict
- Posts: 4042
- Joined: Wed May 09, 2007 7:42 pm
- Race: NanoTiMaster
- ID: 0
Re: vac ppt suggestion
Because two of the three you CHOOSE to take. The other is almost FORCED upon you.Wukong wrote:I totally agree with Gandy, makes 0 sense having a rule for one PPT and not others.
So your saying, that if you do NOTHING to other accounts for 23 hours, so you can go on vacation for however long with no internet, and your alliance leader decides to use an alliance PPT for whatever reason, you should then be punished for a choice that wasn't yours? Yeah, makes perfect sense
Edit: Note, I support preventing vacation for BM trades, and in-game market PPTs, but not the alliance ones.
viewtopic.php?f=13&t=162732
Suggestions, Comments please
Suggestions, Comments please
R8 wrote:TEAM WORK WILL BEAT $$ ANYDAY OF THE WEEKangel wrote:Except the payday [-X
12agnar0k wrote:Also it's still not a war game, you have att/def weps yes, but you also have uu and UP, does this mean its a sex game, oh no, XRATEDSGW, THIS GAME IS PORN!
Ban Admin
<+CABAL> so adminHere, ever thought about playing SGW? :b
<~adminHere> cabal - i do
<+CABAL>
<+Sarevok> Cabal, look up Jtest
<~adminHere> no -not jtest
<~adminHere> another i am a multi
<+Sarevok> :O
* +CABAL screens
<+CABAL> :b
* +Sarevok Ban's Admin
- ~phalax~
- Forum Regular
- Posts: 684
- Joined: Wed Jan 14, 2009 5:04 pm
- Alliance: Omegan Empire
- Race: Omegan Monkey
- Location: New Zealand
Re: vac ppt suggestion
Sarevok wrote:Because two of the three you CHOOSE to take. The other is almost FORCED upon you.Wukong wrote:I totally agree with Gandy, makes 0 sense having a rule for one PPT and not others.
So your saying, that if you do NOTHING to other accounts for 23 hours, so you can go on vacation for however long with no internet, and your alliance leader decides to use an alliance PPT for whatever reason, you should then be punished for a choice that wasn't yours? Yeah, makes perfect sense
Edit: Note, I support preventing vacation for BM trades, and in-game market PPTs, but not the alliance ones.
Not sure why you came across all aggressive but I'll answer in two parts son
1. Are you saying there should be one rule for one thing and not the other? Because that doesn't make sense
2. Are you being punished for being in a house that your alliance leader chose? It's just part and parcel of being in an alliance bud
You take the good with the bad, you can't have your way all the time.
- jedi~tank
- Forum Zombie
- Posts: 9936
- Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2007 12:43 pm
- ID: 0
- Location: Creepin in the back door
Re: vac ppt suggestion
Wukong wrote:Sarevok wrote:Because two of the three you CHOOSE to take. The other is almost FORCED upon you.Wukong wrote:I totally agree with Gandy, makes 0 sense having a rule for one PPT and not others.
So your saying, that if you do NOTHING to other accounts for 23 hours, so you can go on vacation for however long with no internet, and your alliance leader decides to use an alliance PPT for whatever reason, you should then be punished for a choice that wasn't yours? Yeah, makes perfect sense
Edit: Note, I support preventing vacation for BM trades, and in-game market PPTs, but not the alliance ones.
Not sure why you came across all aggressive but I'll answer in two parts son
1. Are you saying there should be one rule for one thing and not the other? Because that doesn't make sense
2. Are you being punished for being in a house that your alliance leader chose? It's just part and parcel of being in an alliance bud
You take the good with the bad, you can't have your way all the time.
It looks to me like Sarevok laid it out sensibly. His version makes the most sense.
"What I want to see is a tight knit group not a collection of people pulling in different directions"
Deni
-
- Forum Addict
- Posts: 2955
- Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2011 10:44 am
- ID: 97472
- Alternate name(s): ~HydroFlux™~, Reinhardt
Re: vac ppt suggestion
PPT is PPT, if its a 48H ppt you buy you should not be able to vac within 24hours of it. HOWEVER, there is also no reason to need to spend 10$$ on th egame the day before you go on holiday
-
- Forum Addict
- Posts: 4042
- Joined: Wed May 09, 2007 7:42 pm
- Race: NanoTiMaster
- ID: 0
Re: vac ppt suggestion
Thank you. And in response to Wukong:Jedi~Tank wrote:Wukong wrote:Sarevok wrote:Because two of the three you CHOOSE to take. The other is almost FORCED upon you.Wukong wrote:I totally agree with Gandy, makes 0 sense having a rule for one PPT and not others.
So your saying, that if you do NOTHING to other accounts for 23 hours, so you can go on vacation for however long with no internet, and your alliance leader decides to use an alliance PPT for whatever reason, you should then be punished for a choice that wasn't yours? Yeah, makes perfect sense
Edit: Note, I support preventing vacation for BM trades, and in-game market PPTs, but not the alliance ones.
Not sure why you came across all aggressive but I'll answer in two parts son
1. Are you saying there should be one rule for one thing and not the other? Because that doesn't make sense
2. Are you being punished for being in a house that your alliance leader chose? It's just part and parcel of being in an alliance bud
You take the good with the bad, you can't have your way all the time.
It looks to me like Sarevok laid it out sensibly. His version makes the most sense.
1) Yes, I am. Think of it this way, they are two DIFFERENT things. They both put you on to PPT that is correct, but then sabotage and massing both destroy the enemies weapons do they not? But you would consider these different actions right?
With getting PPT, you can use market turns or the black market (attacking), but you can also be put on PPT by the alliance leader (sabotage). Two different actions, same result.
2) When choosing a house MOST (probably not all) alliances would consult with their alliance members before committing to a house. And if a member doesn't like it, they have 5 days to leave anyway. As opposed to alliance wide PPT, which is usually NOT consulted upon by alliance members, and is instead used to defend the alliance, especially when most member maybe offline.
Actually, most/all people agree, BM PPT *AND* Market PPT should affect when you can go on vacation. The issue is alliance PPT, which can be given without warning, and stop people from going on vacation.Andy! wrote:PPT is PPT, if its a 48H ppt you buy you should not be able to vac within 24hours of it. HOWEVER, there is also no reason to need to spend 10$$ on th egame the day before you go on holiday
viewtopic.php?f=13&t=162732
Suggestions, Comments please
Suggestions, Comments please
R8 wrote:TEAM WORK WILL BEAT $$ ANYDAY OF THE WEEKangel wrote:Except the payday [-X
12agnar0k wrote:Also it's still not a war game, you have att/def weps yes, but you also have uu and UP, does this mean its a sex game, oh no, XRATEDSGW, THIS GAME IS PORN!
Ban Admin
<+CABAL> so adminHere, ever thought about playing SGW? :b
<~adminHere> cabal - i do
<+CABAL>
<+Sarevok> Cabal, look up Jtest
<~adminHere> no -not jtest
<~adminHere> another i am a multi
<+Sarevok> :O
* +CABAL screens
<+CABAL> :b
* +Sarevok Ban's Admin