StarGateWars Forums

Carrying capacity: 100M
Threshold: 200M
15AT attack above threshold: 100M stolen *and* 50M destroyed. (as opposed to current 100M stolen and 100M destroyed.

Player A has 100M carrying capacity.
Player B has 4B Naquadah in the open.
Player A attacks: 100M N stolen, and another 50M N destroyed, player B has 3.850B N left.
Player A attacks 9 more times: each hit 100M N is stolen, and another 50M N destroyed. Player B has 2.500B N left.
Player A cannot attack player B again until the next day.
(However: Player B can still be attacked by Player C, D, ..
Player A can still attack player C, D, ..)

Z E R O wrote:I strongly disagree,

Farming is already mega-underpowered as it is. (several players, including myself one of the most active farmers on the server) make more naq per day than we can farm in a week. Taking away the dream of finding that one good hit, makes farming so much less desirable. When it already is quite so. I agree with the need to stomp out feeding, as I don't support it any more than the next guy. I just wish we could come up with another way to accomplish it...

™LoT wrote:

Z E R O wrote:I strongly disagree,

Farming is already mega-underpowered as it is. (several players, including myself one of the most active farmers on the server) make more naq per day than we can farm in a week. Taking away the dream of finding that one good hit, makes farming so much less desirable. When it already is quite so. I agree with the need to stomp out feeding, as I don't support it any more than the next guy. I just wish we could come up with another way to accomplish it...

agree with ZERO here...is war game with farming on base...so if farming will become nonprofitable then we just will grow ourself and nobody will do nothing...what is the point to grow only on your income ??

xdjoker wrote:I feel that this update is completely unnecessary with limiting the number of times you can attack a person. With the current system of destroying an enemies naq when you attack already puts a major damper of feeding as it is since they will need to have a lot more naq for it to be effective now.

Also with this new corruption of naq system for attacking. One would have to ask what is the point of even having blitzkreig now. With blitzkreig one can only burn a players naq and kill a couple ground troops. They cant destroy motherships, pastors, spies/anti spies, or weapons with blitzkreig.

Basically with these new updates you have effectively made the normal attack exactly like blitzkreig except with the normal attack they have the capability of destroying motherships and a slightly higher turn cost. So i gotta ask whats the point of even having the blitzkreig option if the normal attack is gonna be exactly like it?

BMMJ13 wrote:In fact if you really want to limit feeding, you should make it so there's like a maximum amount of naq you can steal from a person a day, say 10x of your max carrying capacity. That should be enough that most players can go normally, while still limiting feeding, yet avoiding screwing over those who play normally.

Juliette wrote:No - for now - to a farming cap. The idea is good, and we will continue to evaluate its feasibility and values, but this is not going to happen - not now anyway. (Good thought though.)

The 'destruction' only takes place when the attacker has 100+ MS, so 'low MS players' (big majority of players) can just farm like they want. 'Big MS players' can farm as much as they want too, just need to think who you are going to hit. (And need a little more coordination when friends want to help out, if you want the full feed.)