well even tho i think that the planets update is a great idea dont get me wrong but as ive kept playing ive found out that it is alot harder for lower ranked players to get planets because of the high ranked people have em all nearly so i propose that we should do something about it so everybody has equel chances of having a planet or 2 please write your comments
jado out
planet obtaining by lower ranking players
- Lord Mandalore
- Forum Newbie
- Posts: 8
- Joined: Wed Nov 09, 2005 6:30 am
- ID: 0
- Location: essex
planet obtaining by lower ranking players
Last edited by Lord Mandalore on Sat Oct 14, 2006 1:09 am, edited 1 time in total.
- PSICOLIX
- Forum Intermediate
- Posts: 871
- Joined: Mon Feb 06, 2006 2:56 am
- ID: 0
Re: planet obtaining by lower ranking players
jado1 wrote:well even tho i think that the planets update is a great idea dont get me wrong but as ive kept playing ive found out that it is alot harder for lower ranked players to get planets because of the high ranked people have em all nearly so i propose that we should do something about it so everybody has equel chances of having a planet or 2 please write your comments
jado out
i belive increase the number of planets availeble on the COSMOS woude solve this!
new Sing soon.
-
R3B3L
- Forum Elder
- Posts: 2109
- Joined: Sun Sep 24, 2006 3:01 am
- Race: Asgard
- ID: 29252
- Location: Leciester, England
- Contact:
- Spacey
- Forum Zombie
- Posts: 7426
- Joined: Wed Oct 05, 2005 6:00 pm
- ID: 0
- Location: five steps behind where I need to be
Running Death wrote:If you add a limit on players for planets THEN add more planets it would make more sence.
There is a limit of 10 per player. It can be tough finding a planet, but even harder holding onto one. Therefore, I think the issue isn't with finding a planet for a newer player, but rather holding on to one once they've got it.
I imagine that once planets were introduced the people playing all had an equal chance in finding a planet(I wasn't a part of it either), but the stronger players attacked for planets and now hold them. We all have a "Home Planet" that we can't really do much with.
I understand what you saying and appriciate it. I can only suggest building your realm up(UP, fleets, etc.) and when you're ready attack for them. It's what I'm planning on doing.

"We few. We happy few. We band of brothers.
For those who shed their blood with me today
will always be my brother."


-
Finarfin
- Forum Regular
- Posts: 540
- Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2005 3:00 pm
- Alliance: Deathwing
- Race: Tollan
- ID: 40002
Definetly needs to be more put into the cosmos. Most new players wont be able to touch the defenses on planets for months, and by then the defenses will be even higher (My planets are nothing special, and ive got around 1b defense on them).
Feedback
My calculator - try it out Calculates UP, covert power, covert levels and income.
Leader of the smallest alliance in the top 150.
My calculator - try it out Calculates UP, covert power, covert levels and income.
Leader of the smallest alliance in the top 150.
- Lord Mandalore
- Forum Newbie
- Posts: 8
- Joined: Wed Nov 09, 2005 6:30 am
- ID: 0
- Location: essex
-
R3B3L
- Forum Elder
- Posts: 2109
- Joined: Sun Sep 24, 2006 3:01 am
- Race: Asgard
- ID: 29252
- Location: Leciester, England
- Contact:
- Lord Mandalore
- Forum Newbie
- Posts: 8
- Joined: Wed Nov 09, 2005 6:30 am
- ID: 0
- Location: essex
- Spacey
- Forum Zombie
- Posts: 7426
- Joined: Wed Oct 05, 2005 6:00 pm
- ID: 0
- Location: five steps behind where I need to be
I wouldn't want to spend hundreds of billions on planetary defences, attack, etc. to have it taken away when I improve in the game. It seems like a punishment for getting better rather than encouragement...and I think the point you are getting at is to help those lower in the pecking order move up. What incentive is there, regarding planets, to move up if you lose what you invested so heavily in?

"We few. We happy few. We band of brothers.
For those who shed their blood with me today
will always be my brother."


- Hells__Angel
- Forum Elder
- Posts: 2220
- Joined: Sat Jun 24, 2006 2:38 am
- Grand Admiral Martin
- Forum Expert
- Posts: 1428
- Joined: Sun Jan 01, 2006 2:46 pm
- Alliance: I serve only myself.
- Race: Ascended Irish
- ID: 33984
- Location: Unknown
-
Neimenljivi
- Forum Zombie
- Posts: 6140
- Joined: Sat Jun 17, 2006 12:23 am
- Alliance: Lone wolf
- Race: Slovenian
- ID: 82089
- Location: Slovenia
-
R3B3L
- Forum Elder
- Posts: 2109
- Joined: Sun Sep 24, 2006 3:01 am
- Race: Asgard
- ID: 29252
- Location: Leciester, England
- Contact:
- Wolf359
- The Big Bad Admin
- Posts: 5208
- Joined: Sat Feb 19, 2005 2:40 am
- Alliance: EPA
- Race: Tauri
- ID: 0
- Location: Omnipresent
- Contact:
-
Honours and Awards
Lots have people have said it is tough to find a planet - but even harder to hold on to it. Well, like I tell my officers and alliance members - do not even think about getting a planet unless you know you can hold on to it - i.e. can spend at least 10 billion (probably a lot more now) naq on its defences immediately.
As for the availability of planets - there are planets out there - my MS has found planets twice in the last 4 or 5 times it has been out. In fact the last time it said 'This planet was chosen out of 85 possibilities' - and that was only a couple of hours ago.
As for the availability of planets - there are planets out there - my MS has found planets twice in the last 4 or 5 times it has been out. In fact the last time it said 'This planet was chosen out of 85 possibilities' - and that was only a couple of hours ago.
Mod SpeakSeverian wrote:So I say as a last resort, splice Semper & Wolf359 for a good balance, Clone said unholy abomination a hundred times, let loose on forums and problem solved.
-
hfown
- Forum Irregular
- Posts: 417
- Joined: Sun Mar 26, 2006 10:14 am
- Alliance: Ancient Brethren
- Race: season 10+ tauri
- ID: 1970200
- Location: USA East






