StarGateWars Forums

Who he thinks covert should go back to how it was? Im not a fan of Anti and i think it annoyed a lot of the older players. It is way to powerfull at the moment.

If somebody wants 20 million odd spys without them getting killed then let them. This way whoever wants a really good covert can train up millions of spys, while the ones that dont can earn more income from there uu.

Anti-Covert is good fun. I would really miss it Also I think it would be pretty boring if there was no way to destroy someone's Covert.

I like the way it is that training a couple million covert agents is always a risk. If there was no way to kill them, how exactly could you hurt people with huge army sizes at all?

Lord Talos wrote:Who he thinks covert should go back to how it was? Im not a fan of Anti and i think it annoyed a lot of the older players. It is way to powerfull at the moment.

If somebody wants 20 million odd spys without them getting killed then let them. This way whoever wants a really good covert can train up millions of spys, while the ones that dont can earn more income from there uu.

Buying spy lvls is more difficult than training spies, training too many spies is risky.

Tactics are part of the game, training up 20 mil spies is just stupid.

My dear anti:D Keep it:D

BTW if you want to get rid of anti, dont use it:P LOL and you are free to train 20m spies...

if they go i want my anti level money back

I really love Anti and the game would be sooooo boring without it...

If there have to be any changes to Anticovert at all, then it should be a way of killing them More stuff to destroy - more fun

geisha wrote:I really love Anti and the game would be sooooo boring without it...

If there have to be any changes to Anticovert at all, then it should be a way of killing them More stuff to destroy - more fun

Agreed, then people can't have a stat we can't hurt.

In the end I think that anti-covert benefits the weaker players since people do not have super super coverts anymore. So since the coverts are left at bay it gives the weak a chance to catch up somewhat.

in a way... I ALMOST agree with you... almost. But that might be me remembering the good old days... when I could have rank 5k defence and rank 150 covert, and never get farmed... or when I stored ALL UU in my covert... I almost wish I could do that again. *sigh*

shouldn't the covert troops fight one another... after all there are only so many shadows on a realm of which 1million+ spies can hide...

more so when you send 1-2million spies into the realm to discover secrets...

there for i invoke the right of

Spy vs Spy

Everyone has 1 Super Spy
The Attacker is White
The Defender is Black

and its a battle of wits and nerve to kill the other spy!

TheRook

Anti-covert should not be removed. However, I do agree to the fact that it's overpowered a little.
1: Anti's can't be directly attacked.
2: Anti's don't die on 0 defense (which can simply be achieved by massing someone)

I think either 1 or both of those need attention.
For 1: Maybe a new attack type, or maybe damage offense and anti if you get past enemy defense.
For 2: Maybe make it so spies will not die without a fight, even if there's no defense soldiers left to protect them. They won't be as powerful as the assasins, but at least they'll take out a few of them. No more free covert massings.

Antis should be able to attack antis!

I do agree that once you reach a certain point in hunting spies that you should begin to hunt assassins at that point.

No stat should be untouchable by any means in a true war game.

Acronon

Never really anti'd till recently. And it owns... so yeah.

Leave it.

Tactics..