I was thinking and it finally hit me. in the world today people try to dominate over one another, while others try to fight for their freedom.
for each alliance there should be an invasion fleet and a allaince deffence facilities. if alliance A completly destroys alliance B's alliance deffence then alliance B is under the control of alliance A. alliance A then makes 10% of everyone in alliance B's income, but members of alliance B dosnt loose 10% of their income. this income would go into the alliance bank or slave bank, that only the leader and 2nd can withdrawl from. for alliance B to not be controled by alliance A, alliance B has to pay so much to not be controled by anyone. Each alliance can control as many alliances as they want but the alliances invasion if completly destroyes once you take over an alliance. also since alliance B would be under control of alliance A, when alliance A declares war on alliance C, allinace B automaticlly declare war on alliance C wether they want to or not. once alliance A delcares peace with alliance C, so dose alliance B.
this will help some alliances out and will be a pain for others. but its kinda like real life. in real life everyone wants to control as much teritory as they can or as many countries as they can, so in the game everyone is trying to control as many alliances as they can, and in return the alliance would get 10% income of every alliance they control and it would go into the slave bank or alliance bank that only the leader and 2nd can withdraw, but no one in the alliances that are controled loose any income. just a bonus for controling alliances.
also alliance A can put deffences on alliance B deffence so alliance C couldnt take control of alliance B but alliance B cant build a deffence until after they pay a certain price to be free from alliance A only alliance A can buy a deffence for alliance B and thats if alliance A wants to keep control of alliance B, but if alliance C took control of alliance A alliance C wouldnt control alliance B, just alliance A.
its just another thing so people dont get so bored and it could help out alliances too but dosnt hurt alliances so smaller alliances wouldnt have trouble growing or anything, just when they are controled and dont want to go to war but their controler dose, then they have a problem.
let me know what you guys think
New alliance war suggestion
-
III
- Forum Grunt
- Posts: 92
- Joined: Sun Nov 19, 2006 6:05 pm
- ID: 0
- Location: Elwood, IN
- chargin
- Forum Intermediate
- Posts: 820
- Joined: Sat Feb 17, 2007 3:45 pm
- ID: 0
Re: New alliance war suggestion
needs a little more thought...

I say smart things so people don't realize how dumb i am.
-
Saber
- Forum Irregular
- Posts: 322
- Joined: Fri Jan 27, 2006 12:01 am
Re: New alliance war suggestion
If alliance B doesn't lose any income this could be a majorly abused update.

-
III
- Forum Grunt
- Posts: 92
- Joined: Sun Nov 19, 2006 6:05 pm
- ID: 0
- Location: Elwood, IN
Re: New alliance war suggestion
yes it dose need more thought I was just getting the basic idea put on it. but if alliance B lost income then people would get mad well the smaller alliances cause they couldnt get free from the bigger alliances, and plus it would get the alliances more active and alliance wars would be bigger and better than they are now
