PPT / Massing Loses.

[SÅTÅN 666]

PPT:

This game is turning into a game of Peace...Non want to war anymore..Just want to have peace...SAY NO TO PPT I suggest having atleast 1 PPT a week, instead of the 2 PPTs you can have.


Massing loses:

Make massing loses less.. Take away the % that was added in the last update..This would make people want to mass more because there'd be less loses in strike...Like when you hit a 50b defence with a 300b strike you lose 100k UUs +...back when this % update wasn't added you'd lose around 10 - 15k UUs or less...

[Sphinx42]

PPT:

This game is turning into a game of Peace...Non want to war anymore..Just want to have peace...SAY NO TO PPT I suggest having atleast 1 PPT a week, instead of the 2 PPTs you can have.


Massing loses:

Make massing loses less.. Take away the % that was added in the last update..This would make people want to mass more because there'd be less loses in strike...Like when you hit a 50b defence with a 300b strike you lose 100k UUs +...back when this % update wasn't added you'd lose around 10 - 15k UUs or less...

I suppose you meant at most 1 PPT... although it could be funny to force everyone to use at least one PPT per week Other than that, I'm fine with the idea, but I'm sure people who can't log in every day won't agree. But even if this idea is accepted (which I doubt will happen), I'd say that it would at least be nice to still have the possibility to trade for market supporter status bonus (i.e., you get the bank size bonus but not PPT).
And I think the losses are OK as they are now.

[TacticalCommander]

I've been thinking about this too, and I think that if you can still get two bank size increases a week, then I have no problem, and in fact agree with 1 PPT a week. Perhaps a separation should be made, bank size or PPT instead of both with 1 MT. Sure there will be complaining, but I think it would be the best for the war game.

Another thought, it only costs 8-9bil for a PPT. Thats pretty cheap for 48hrs worth of total realm protection. I think that PPTs should cost more, like an entire days worth of income, yes it will vary from player to player. But after all, a bigger realm would need more protection around it.



I think losses are ok, I admit its heavy, but at the same time, there less AT, so doing more losses with 15 turns helps offset the less AT to mass with.

[Cole]

NONONONONONONO!! PPT is not only used for running out in wars it's also for when your week is busy and you can't log every four hours to bank naq at none level of alert!

[gooseman the first]

PPT:

This game is turning into a game of Peace...Non want to war anymore..Just want to have peace...SAY NO TO PPT I suggest having atleast 1 PPT a week, instead of the 2 PPTs you can have.


Massing loses:

Make massing loses less.. Take away the % that was added in the last update..This would make people want to mass more because there'd be less loses in strike...Like when you hit a 50b defence with a 300b strike you lose 100k UUs +...back when this % update wasn't added you'd lose around 10 - 15k UUs or less...

Gooseman approved

[Manetheren]

How about a max of 6 per month instead of 8.. There are some weeks that 4 days away from sgw are needed.

[TacticalCommander]

NONONONONONONO!! PPT is not only used for running out in wars it's also for when your week is busy and you can't log every four hours to bank naq at none level of alert!

Then build a defense
Its what its there for. or use the higher realm alert.

How about a max of 6 per month instead of 8.. There are some weeks that 4 days away from sgw are needed.

I still think that 1 a week is good, thats 4 a month, but have it so you can do 4 days in a row still. So a max 2 per week, so that 2 weeks out of 4 you can have a 4 day PPT, or you can have 4 weeks with 1 day PPT.

but honestly, if your that busy or need away time, the admin has programed vacation mode into the game.

[Teal'auc of the Void]

I agree with 1 PPT per week. 0 PPT's per week would be even better, but oh well...



Teal'auc

[Suggestive Disorder]

you all know that admin wont change how many ppts people can get...

so why do you keep suggesting it?

also, there is already a topic on limiting ppt... just go to the common suggestions topic to find it...

[Lord_Zeus]

I would agree with decreasing the losses... though not for the same reason, I'm unsure why they were increased in the first place, they were rather heavy.

[Cole]

you all know that admin wont change how many ppts people can get...

so why do you keep suggesting it?

also, there is already a topic on limiting ppt... just go to the common suggestions topic to find it...

FORTUNATELY

And hmmm about increasing my def? Huh no thanks I don't want to waste trillions of naq to build a trillion defence I want to keep getting my 200+billions per "working week" without none alert I wouldn't get them so PPTs stay as they are PERIOD!!!!