% on attack/defence loses

[SÅTÅN 666]

They are shoking...You hit a 50b defence with 350b strike and you lose 20k UUs + and they lose 10 - 15k...I remeber in the day the smaller the defence less loses...so I'd only have like 5k - 7k loses and not 20k +, can this be removed?

[Rich™]

You hit a 50b defence with 350b strike and you lose 20k UUs + and they lose 10 - 15k

lol, i dont

[Rich™]

actually i was wrong

05:33 XXXX 30,129,445,822 Naquadah stolen 15 46,632 28,558

30k = like 18bil + training to make supers again, plus 600mil weapon repair, + 15 AT, plus a few shields almost makes the hit not worth it

edit: actually need to wake up, you said 50bil defense not 150 (the guy above had a 158 i think), so on a 50 i'd imagine to loose 10k tops.

[RobinInDaHood]

The losses are based on the army size involved, not only the attack/defense ratio. If you hit a 1 billion defense with a 1 trillion strike, you will always take higher losses because the attacking force is larger.

[deathguard]

what thats stupid if there was actualy a war if those forces clashed it would be a rout with most of the defending army dead unless the army marched up slowly with no thoguht for self preservation i dont see how this works

[Almost38]

ir it was a real battle the army with more men would more likely lose more since theres more people to kill so easier targets

[Rich™]

yeap that's why i like playing 1 v 3 (with me being the one)

i'll either die with no kills, or kill 2/3 of them and win that round. it's hardly ever 1 for 1.

[DarkSchneider]

Anyone who has ever played an FPS (First Person Shooter) game online with highly unbalanced teams (number of players on each team) then you would know, more people to = more kills

Not entirely true. If you meet a few guys that are organized and run around in a pack or squad, they will pwn most everyone. Happens on Halo 3 all the time. One guy takes the brunt of the attack, the others flank and take them down. The guy that took the attack moves to the back and becomes a flanker so they can recharge or heal.

I can see both sides to this argument, though...

[Zeratul]

could ya take the non-sgw game discussion elsewhere? it pretty much doesnt have anything to do with the topic...

[Omoc]

ir it was a real battle the army with more men would more likely lose more since theres more people to kill so easier targets

Yes, but if it was a real battle, the army with more men would kill all (maybe left few of them who were hidding)... but this is not the real battle... it's a game!

And i agree as well, higher the attack minus defence is, less losses should happen on the attacking side

just my two cents
cheers

[hidden]

ooo starcraft ums tug o war 1v2 the 1 will always win


anyway i think if you attack really overpowers the defence then the attack should take less damage