geisha wrote:A moderator locks a war thread and starts a new one because he could not be bothered to moderate the old one.
Said moderator gets massed over it.
Said moderator complains about his massing and locks the second thread he started too.
The thread about the moderator's massing gets locked too.
I start a new thread in order to reply to what the moderator had posted.
My thread gets deleted.
Another moderator starts a thread about the whole issue.
I repost my thread.
My thread gets locked because the moderator claims there is already a thread about the issue (his thread).
So I am asking the community: Am I the only one who does not agree with that kind of moderating? Locking threads instead of moderating them? Deleting threads without giving a reason or even informing the poster about it? Locking threads because you only allow your own threads and just silently delete other threads which were posted before yours?
First of didnt know you had made a that topic before mine i saw it after mine therefore i locked it if your had been first i would have locked my own and moved in there. Secondly this issues Could also have been brought up into the topic about it instead you start a new one.
That Said he locked a topic on fair grounds i my self would have do that. He made a clean one meaning he didnt breake a rule or misused his power it has nothing to do with modding the whole topic it has something to with rules and that a few had complained about it thats fair ground.
The massing on him is uncalled for yes.
Now Want this merged with mine or locked i now give you the coice but having this in 2 topics is plain stupid??







