R D Anderson wrote:but there is a need
There is a 'want' there is no 'need'
R D Anderson wrote:but there is a need
Mister Sandman wrote:R D Anderson wrote:but there is a need
There is a 'want' there is no 'need'

Kit-Fox wrote:I avoided doing a mass qoute of that material Thamuz, becasue I'm not sure all of it is back by fully research emprical evidence. While Hemp does have a lot of uses and indeed is very versatile some of the statements made on the site you grabbed that from really do need som serious backing up


Jack wrote:Mister Sandman wrote:Nay :- For the obvious moral [...] reasons.
Keep your BS ideals of morality to yourself, princess. No one here cares for it.
That said, I also vote no. Every single pothead I have ever met has made Sandman here look like Einstein with the class of an old rich gentleman...


















BMMJ13 wrote:Jack wrote:Mister Sandman wrote:Nay :- For the obvious moral [...] reasons.
Keep your BS ideals of morality to yourself, princess. No one here cares for it.
That said, I also vote no. Every single pothead I have ever met has made Sandman here look like Einstein with the class of an old rich gentleman...
I say no just to piss off Alex, however it could solve economic problems in certain american states that enjoy its medical benefits already *cough* California *cough* *cough*extreme taxation *cough*


[mH] Λ Ëмρêđõςľëş Λ says: (11:11:19 PM)
Weed should be legalized
[BoT] Don Karnage says: (11:09:06 PM)
Oh and all deals are off if you have a penis
Phailmangoe says: (11:32:26 AM)
pfft jews aren't even real
MSN wrote:[EPA] BMMJ13 [BoT] Mr. Orange says (11:35 PM)
only one of us can wear black eyeliner
and im not stopping
xXxsephirothxXx wrote:Mister Sandman wrote:R D Anderson wrote:but there is a need
There is a 'want' there is no 'need'
Meh i smell a lazy person who has nothing and is currently thinking up excuses
I have seen some ill effects of it.. one of my friends completely passed out while standing, was pretty funny haha
[/spoiler]Kit-Fox wrote:This kind of discussion has involved Sandman before, hence I would think his reluctance to post again, especially as all of his reason are based upon biased and incomplete evidence and theories. There are many credible studies that show, without a doubt that marijuana is health, economic and social risks directly and indirectly associated with it.
For example in this thread alone Sanman mentions that it should be illegal for the 'obvious moral reasons'. Moral in this case is what Sandman himself decides is moral and of course as he alone is chosen by god to be the most holy upon this earth he must be right.It isnt just that.
As for health reasons, well again Sandman has overlooked that the plant from which cannabis is derived is Hemp which was used and in some countries you'll find still is used to created bandages (for all sorts of uses including cold compresses, which would release some of the active THC {albeit in small, tiny amounts}) and that the oli created from hemp was and is used to clean wounds. I have of course just mentioned those uses that I can verify are still in use today. Of course smoking cannabis releases THC into the bloodstream which is a relaxant, your blood vessels expand in size and your muscles relax while you are under its influence. All of which can be very helpful for a wide variety of conditions which once again Sandman has overlooked.
However that is widely irrelevant. Note your bold areas, you state "the plant from which cannabis is derived is Hemp". This is not in dispute. They arent technically the same thing. Thus, your argument, is irrelevant.
Go Here To look at the differences butween, marijuana and hemp.
And we have before gone round & round the well established fact that the effects drugs have on society is widely because of poor education and drugs been pushed onto those who cant afford them or shouldnt use them in the first place.
Folks what he says here is " If your rich, you can use whatever drug you want because well your rich and have a high education and can afford it so... enjoy..." (Lawyers would love you)
A comprehensive education (for all ages) about drugs would have to take place first before the effects on society can be minimised. However the people to blame for this arent the drug users but the people who drove it so far underground in the first place, ie el gov.
If a government places the law to make murder illegal , and someone murders, due to 'poor education' who is at fault? the murder or the government who placed the law?
If you drink and drive. And you get caught. Who is at fault?
The person who made the law or you? same principle applies here. Education does not = wisdom or any sense of logic. Age does not = Wisdom or any sense of logic.
Poppler King wrote:To Mister Sandman i'm not going to bother to go through your reasons for cannabis to be illegal because you seem to be above giving us that courtesy, but what i will say is that its the uneducated masses like you who are the reason that cannabis is still illegal.
(Please note by uneducated i mean you are uneducated when it comes to cannabis, i'm not making a personal jab at you but due to the unexplained reasons you gave for keeping cannabis illegal it is quite obvious you know very little about the drug)