i'm starting to feel like a proverbial dog chasing its own tail
LF, its a VERIFIABLE FACT that Marijuana/Hemp is NOT addictive!



lone dragon wrote:I have a question....If a drug is illegal who is going to admit it to be tested and who would admit they are smoking it let alone admit to an addiction?

[mH] Λ Ëмρêđõςľëş Λ says: (11:11:19 PM)
Weed should be legalized
[BoT] Don Karnage says: (11:09:06 PM)
Oh and all deals are off if you have a penis
Phailmangoe says: (11:32:26 AM)
pfft jews aren't even real
Alex wrote:I'll respond to Sandman later when I have more time.



















BMMJ13 wrote:Marijuana causes you to become emasculated and argue on forums regarding its legalization, while doing little to actually help your cause.
![[047.gif] :smt047](./images/smilies/047.gif)
BMMJ13 wrote:Marijuana causes you to become emasculated and argue on forums regarding its legalization, while doing little to actually help your cause.


Agapooka wrote:The argument that because a premise cannot be proven false, it must be true, is known as a Negative Proof Fallacy in logic.
Pooka's UU Market Loyalty Card:Mister Sandman wrote:Nothing at all near the negative proof fallacy in logic. If it cannot be proven false, it has to be true.
Illicit, illegitimate: contrary to or forbidden by law; "an illegitimate seizure of power"; "illicit trade"; "an outlaw strike"; "unlawful measures"
wordnetweb.princeton.edu/perl/webwn
Agapooka wrote:The argument that because a premise cannot be proven false, it must be true, is known as a Negative Proof Fallacy in logic.
Pooka's UU Market Loyalty Card:Mister Sandman wrote:Nothing at all near the negative proof fallacy in logic. If it cannot be proven false, it has to be true.
Agapooka wrote:Aspirine is a drug, too.
Or did you mean "illicit drugs"? If so, the "pro" argument is that marijuana is NOT illicit.
Yes and... erm... I know this. I was obviously arguing against the pro position.Illicit, illegitimate: contrary to or forbidden by law; "an illegitimate seizure of power"; "illicit trade"; "an outlaw strike"; "unlawful measures"
wordnetweb.princeton.edu/perl/webwn
If an argument relies on grouping marijuana and illicit drugs together and the contrary position questions that very premise, I would infer that such a premise is of low quality and unsuitable, and, in this case, tautological. If we are trying to prove that marijuana should be illegal, we should not rely on it having the status of an illegal drug to prove that.
Agapooka
Agapooka wrote:The argument that because a premise cannot be proven false, it must be true, is known as a Negative Proof Fallacy in logic.
Pooka's UU Market Loyalty Card:Mister Sandman wrote:Nothing at all near the negative proof fallacy in logic. If it cannot be proven false, it has to be true.