i see no need to shoot you down




Universe wrote:You don't have a case, as Lord Thriller clearly explained.
MajorLeeHurts wrote:^ stole the car and my Booze and my heart * sobs*
Jack wrote: Just wanna be more like you, Master Thriller.




[KMA]Avenger wrote:minimizing this mess doesn't make it right or justify it.


Everyone dies. I have experienced it with people close to me before, and while I might not respond entirely rational to that, that does not change the fact that their deaths would be insignificant. Now, if a great person were to die, the human race as a whole should mourn.. but the statistical relevance of one death, even if it is me myself, is insignificant. What can I say.. I'm a cold b!tch.[KMA]Avenger wrote:ok, lets put "that" calculus into "perspective" shall we...what if say 5 or 6 of those that died where members of your family...would you still brush it off so lightly?! i think not- not even if just 1 of those deaths was related to you![]()
[KMA]Avenger wrote:these vaccines dont work and that's a fact you can verify for yourself all day long...being the nice chap that i am, i'll help you![]()
Gardacil (Cervical Cancer Vaccine) Deaths:
http://www.google.co.uk/#hl=en&source=h ... eaa343dff4
[KMA]Avenger wrote:as for heaven and hell, i'm agnostic remember?!

[KMA]Avenger wrote:Universe wrote:as for heaven and hell, i'm agnostic remember?!
Then from where does that zealous morality come?![]()
Universe wrote:You know.. as entertaining as this has been, I think it has been long enough. I will be going back to my Hochkultur for a while, so my activity here will drop. Do not see the lack of replies as disrespect to you or your cause.

Universe wrote:Everyone dies. I have experienced it with people close to me before, and while I might not respond entirely rational to that, that does not change the fact that their deaths would be insignificant. Now, if a great person were to die, the human race as a whole should mourn.. but the statistical relevance of one death, even if it is me myself, is insignificant. What can I say.. I'm a cold b!tch.[KMA]Avenger wrote:ok, lets put "that" calculus into "perspective" shall we...what if say 5 or 6 of those that died where members of your family...would you still brush it off so lightly?! i think not- not even if just 1 of those deaths was related to you![]()
Now, it might be relevant if 5 or 6 of one family die, if only because it might suggest the vaccine interacts with certain hereditary genes. Then again, it might have been the hand of God, meant to inspire me or someone else to go into the study of improvement of genetics.. *grin*
. Finally, people who never cross the law, as a whole, participate in making this society better. Already one person changing "side" can be significant. Those nobodies going into killing sprees affected society on a bad way. The seeking of "being important" can turn people into goingon kill sprees just to have their names on newspapers.

[KMA]Avenger wrote:those vaccines were all loaded and caused a bunch of deaths, just ask the people and the soldiers who were given the shots...
oh, that's right, you cant ask them, they're all dead!
Universe wrote:You don't have a case, as Lord Thriller clearly explained.
MajorLeeHurts wrote:^ stole the car and my Booze and my heart * sobs*
Jack wrote: Just wanna be more like you, Master Thriller.
Agapooka wrote:The argument that because a premise cannot be proven false, it must be true, is known as a Negative Proof Fallacy in logic.
Pooka's UU Market Loyalty Card:Mister Sandman wrote:Nothing at all near the negative proof fallacy in logic. If it cannot be proven false, it has to be true.