Thriller wrote:double post
Triple, actually..
Thriller wrote:double post

Thriller wrote:@ avenger stop getting sources written by dan brown wannabes who stay locked in their basements. Self satisfying to the sexy idea that they are living la revolution.
Thriller wrote:You can't call any of your sources objective or credible and that is a fact.
Thriller wrote:Bush was reading satanic literature to children on 911 ,give me a break.

Universe wrote:You don't have a case, as Lord Thriller clearly explained.
MajorLeeHurts wrote:^ stole the car and my Booze and my heart * sobs*
Jack wrote: Just wanna be more like you, Master Thriller.
Kit-Fox wrote:I fail to see anything of any significance about Aleister Crowley, he appears to have been a nut who believed in his own press/took a bit too much of his own product.
He also appears to have published several books that are based on serveral precepts of hedonism/occultism & just general worship (by that i mean worshipping gods of all/any kind for the sake of been a worshipper)
I see nothing nefarious/evil/conspiracy like about it, he was just a nut

Agapooka wrote:The argument that because a premise cannot be proven false, it must be true, is known as a Negative Proof Fallacy in logic.
Pooka's UU Market Loyalty Card:Mister Sandman wrote:Nothing at all near the negative proof fallacy in logic. If it cannot be proven false, it has to be true.
Agapooka wrote:I have yet to read the thread, but I wanted to mention how contradictory the idea of blaming those who abstain from voting is with choosing the "lesser of two evils".
You see, if your only choice is between evil and evil, what choice do you have? Can you really blame the people who do not choose evil and express that choice by not voting?
As far as I see it, it's like offering almonds and peanuts to someone who's allergic to all nuts. He might be wiser in not taking any of them. At least, if one of them is imposed upon him, nobody can point at him and tell him how stupid he was for deliberately picking one.
kthx.
Universe wrote:You don't have a case, as Lord Thriller clearly explained.
MajorLeeHurts wrote:^ stole the car and my Booze and my heart * sobs*
Jack wrote: Just wanna be more like you, Master Thriller.
Thriller wrote:@ avenger
well i read your sources and came to different conclusions. Mostly because of what i know concerning the rest of the post you decided to ignore.
When you get to looking into what you conveniently forgot to comment on, let me know.

Jack wrote:Defensive it is. Why is that, Thriller? Why must you resort to insults and diversion? Is it because the idea of a seriously flawed voting system frightens you? I mean, in your posts I have seen absolutely nothing in attempts to prove me wrong, but rather only insults in attempt to belittle my opinion. Why is that? Is it because you know I am right? Is this the only way you are capable of countering my arguments, by attempting to belittle my opinion and diverting from the issue at hand?
Because I have to say, even Sandman's posts/"arguments" are more intelligent. Atleast he tries to prove his points(no matter how stupid they may be).
Universe wrote:You don't have a case, as Lord Thriller clearly explained.
MajorLeeHurts wrote:^ stole the car and my Booze and my heart * sobs*
Jack wrote: Just wanna be more like you, Master Thriller.

[KMA]Avenger wrote:tell me something Thriller...are you one of those that believes in "the magic bullet theory"?
http://www.remnantofgod.org/blackpope.htm
Universe wrote:You don't have a case, as Lord Thriller clearly explained.
MajorLeeHurts wrote:^ stole the car and my Booze and my heart * sobs*
Jack wrote: Just wanna be more like you, Master Thriller.
Thriller wrote:
I also don't beleive in this satanist conspiracy.

[KMA]Avenger wrote:and just how long have you had this delusion?Thriller wrote:
I also don't beleive in this satanist conspiracy.![]()
[KMA]Avenger wrote:i'm curious to know why this is so, even after i have shown enough evidence to cast doubt on all that you think you know.

Radiance wrote:[KMA]Avenger wrote:and just how long have you had this delusion?Thriller wrote:
I also don't beleive in this satanist conspiracy.![]()
The delusion is yours..
And the one we have? Ever since birth. Because, quite frankly, it's what you see when you look at things without the prejudiced attitude of a hopeless anarchist.[KMA]Avenger wrote:i'm curious to know why this is so, even after i have shown enough evidence to cast doubt on all that you think you know.
Clearly you didn't.
