Deposit vote

[Field Marshall]

lol, hilarious

[Clarkey]

No, You are getting charged the fee for 500. so when you look at your transactions. you will see you got charged 503.50.

You are clearly ignorant of the meaning of the word charged. You just said it yourself, you are getting charged the fee for 500, the fee being 3.50.

You are "receiving" 500 and being "charged" 3.50. You are not being "charged" 503.50.

[Rudy Peña]

lol, hilarious

Yes it is. I love making clarkey make a fool of himself.

[Rudy Peña]

No, You are getting charged the fee for 500. so when you look at your transactions. you will see you got charged 503.50.

You are clearly ignorant of the meaning of the word charged. You just said it yourself, you are getting charged the fee for 500, the fee being 3.50.

You are "receiving" 500 and being "charged" 3.50. You are not being "charged" 503.50.

You are receiving, yes. But on your account transaction, you are being charged 503.50. 500 is the money you took and the 3.50 is the fee.

[Kikaz]

lol, hilarious

Yes it is. I love making clarkey make a fool of himself.

Your the only one making a fool of yourself...

If you bought something for 500.00 you might have a tax of 3.50.. with say a credit card or paypal

But your not...

Your at an ATM withdrawing $500.00 of your own dollars according to your scenario.

And getting taxed, or charged $3.50.

Seriously do you even have a bank account?

[Rudy Peña]

lol, hilarious

Yes it is. I love making clarkey make a fool of himself.

Your the only one making a fool of yourself...

If you bought something for 500.00 you might have a tax of 3.50.. with say a credit card or paypal

But your not...

Your at an ATM withdrawing $500.00 of your own dollars according to your scenario.

And getting taxed, or charged $3.50.

Seriously do you even have a bank account?

Do you? Wait, I know you do, cause you use money on the game.

Yes you are withdrawing 500. But if you look at your account, you will see the transaction of 503.50.

[Clarkey]

No, You are getting charged the fee for 500. so when you look at your transactions. you will see you got charged 503.50.

You are clearly ignorant of the meaning of the word charged. You just said it yourself, you are getting charged the fee for 500, the fee being 3.50.

You are "receiving" 500 and being "charged" 3.50. You are not being "charged" 503.50.

You are receiving, yes. But on your account transaction, you are being charged 503.50. 500 is the money you took and the 3.50 is the fee.

Again showing your ignorance to the meaning of being charged. When you are being charged something in relation to money it means the money is being taken away from you. The 3.50 being taken away from you, the 500 is not. The receipt of the deposit would show how much you withdrew and how much you were charged for withdrawing it, i.e. 3.50.

It is the same with the deposit in gatewars, that sentence is meant to be showing (or it used to) what fee it took to deposit that naq. So it would be showing you how much you initially indended to deposit and how much it was charging you from it, i.e. the fee.

[Rudy Peña]

No you are being a stuck up ass.

I am right.

[BMMJ13]

It used to be from tax, it would say how much you tried to deposit, and how much was actually deposited basically.

As it says, (2% of deposit taken as a transaction cost)

Deposit successful. You deposited 98,000,000,000 , which took 100,000,000,000 to do.

Basically you deposited 100 bil, but because of 2% transaction fee, only 98 bil was actually put into your bank.

[Clarkey]

It used to be from tax, it would say how much you tried to deposit, and how much was actually deposited basically.

As it says, (2% of deposit taken as a transaction cost)

Deposit successful. You deposited 98,000,000,000 , which took 100,000,000,000 to do.

Basically you deposited 100 bil, but because of 2% transaction fee, only 98 bil was actually put into your bank.

That makes it clearer. I was under the impression the first number was the amount you were trying to deposit before a fee was taken.

[ƒëmmë ƒatalë]

I dont care what its meant to say as long as both numbers are the same

if I go to the bank and deposit 100.weather I get charged interest or not the total taken is still the same..

be it $100+ 0&
or $98 + $2 interest
the amount going in is the same,

the amount in the acc isnt though

[Rudy Peña]

It used to be from tax, it would say how much you tried to deposit, and how much was actually deposited basically.

As it says, (2% of deposit taken as a transaction cost)

Deposit successful. You deposited 98,000,000,000 , which took 100,000,000,000 to do.

Basically you deposited 100 bil, but because of 2% transaction fee, only 98 bil was actually put into your bank.

That makes it clearer. I was under the impression the first number was the amount you were trying to deposit before a fee was taken.

See, how you are wrong and I was right.

[Kikaz]

Actually..

It was 'You deposited X amount of NAQ at a cost of *Tax*'

So your still wrong.

[Rudy Peña]

Actually..

It was 'You deposited X amount of NAQ at a cost of *Tax*'

So your still wrong.

No, Im right, cause thats what Ive been saying.

Thats for the unascended. What Ive been talking about is for ascended people. But clarkey wanted to be a tool and say something else. Then he made this thread to make drama, when he knows I right.


This is what I posted in the thread that he linked to. Hes the one that made a big deal out of it.

Listen, people who are asceneded. They dont pay the 2%. Only the unascended, so since you have ascended, you keep all the naq you bank. As opposed to when you were unascended.

So, Ascended means no 2%

Unascended means you pay 2%.


There is no bug here.

[Rudy Peña]

This is what Clarkey said......look that the bold and underlined part.

[spoiler]

Thank you for reporting the bug, we'll see that Admin is made aware of it.

It would always be good, to see if the person is ascended or not.

As ascended people, do not have to have no fee.

If you take a second and read what he actually said instead of trying to be smart then you'd see that it doesn't matter whether he is ascended or not.

Listen, people who are asceneded. They dont pay the 2%. Only the unascended, so since you have ascended, you keep all the naq you bank. As opposed to when you were unascended.

So, Ascended means no 2%

Unascended means you pay 2%.


There is no bug here.

Maybe you should listen, in fact read.

We know ascended accounts pay 0% fee when depositing and unascended pay 2% fee when depositing.

Now, if the coding was correct behind the scenes this is what you would see in both circumstances:

Unascended - Deposit successful. You deposited 42,038,902,686, which took 840,778,053 to do.

Ascended - Deposit successful. You deposited 42,038,902,686, which took 0 to do.

But instead he gets this: Deposit successful. You deposited 42,038,902,686, which took 42,038,902,686 to do. Which is basically telling him it took 100% fee to deposit the funds instead of 0%. This doesn't affect the mechanics of the game because the correct funds are actually deposited and/or removed as a fee. But the text being displayed is inaccurate. Not a big bug but still a bug.

Anymore failed smart comments?

[/spoiler]

He is saying that you dont need naq to deposit any naq. Which I said was wrong and that you need naq to deposit any naq.

So therefore, he is wrong.