No automated access/macro driven game play/ interfacing with the server in any way automatically.
No multi account bot nets.
No profiting from knowledge of them.
That is very clear, and fair enough.
I have it on good authority that alliances god quest and create spread sheets of players UID's.
And further their own ends from that data set.
Is that permissible, or just not sufficient for banning everyone involved?
Or more specifically is a manually triggered but automatically gathered and processed data scrape acceptable?
Just thought I would ask before I went any further in planning one.
Bot question.
-
Cwalen
- Fledgling Forumer
- Posts: 167
- Joined: Mon Nov 26, 2012 1:33 am
- ID: 0
-
Juliette Verified
- The Queen
- Posts: 31802
- Joined: Sun Feb 06, 2005 6:57 pm
- Race: Royalty
- ID: 4323
- Alternate name(s): Cersei Lannister
- Location: Ultima Thule
-
JasonJay
- Forum Irregular
- Posts: 408
- Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2012 2:42 am
- ID: 0
- Location: Pretoria South Africa
Re: Bot question.
But there's no way to prove you capturing all the data on a page and tabulating it and creating a data base...
- Sol
- Forum Addict
- Posts: 3807
- Joined: Sat Apr 11, 2009 9:09 pm
- ID: 0
Re: Bot question.
Of course not, there is no 100% sure way of knowing unless you're standing right in front of them, it's based on good judgement
and how crappy the day has been for admin J or I.
Field Marshall wrote:Really?Sol wrote:It's not going to destroy your life
I think this is sig worthy in fact.

-
Cwalen
- Fledgling Forumer
- Posts: 167
- Joined: Mon Nov 26, 2012 1:33 am
- ID: 0
Re: Bot question.
Given that it already occurs.
(manual processing to an ofline data set)
Where is the line?
not merely automated input...
A scripted data collection is out of bounds? (obviously by Juliette's answer)
Is it forbidden for players to submit raw html to a third party site?
(thanks JJ, I don't doubt that I can hide, as a guest in someone else's domain, I would rather respect the word and spirit of the law)
(sol scares me... he codes real good (would hate to distract him from real work by chasing down me hiding))
(manual processing to an ofline data set)
Where is the line?
not merely automated input...
A scripted data collection is out of bounds? (obviously by Juliette's answer)
Is it forbidden for players to submit raw html to a third party site?
(thanks JJ, I don't doubt that I can hide, as a guest in someone else's domain, I would rather respect the word and spirit of the law)
(sol scares me... he codes real good (would hate to distract him from real work by chasing down me hiding))
-
Juliette Verified
- The Queen
- Posts: 31802
- Joined: Sun Feb 06, 2005 6:57 pm
- Race: Royalty
- ID: 4323
- Alternate name(s): Cersei Lannister
- Location: Ultima Thule
Re: Bot question.
Yes.Cwalen wrote:A scripted data collection is out of bounds? (obviously by Juliette's answer)
No.Cwalen wrote:Is it forbidden for players to submit raw html to a third party site?
Cwalen wrote:(thanks JJ, I don't doubt that I can hide, as a guest in someone else's domain, I would rather respect the word and spirit of the law)
*grin* He really is, right?Cwalen wrote:(sol scares me... he codes real good (would hate to distract him from real work by chasing down me hiding))

- Sol
- Forum Addict
- Posts: 3807
- Joined: Sat Apr 11, 2009 9:09 pm
- ID: 0
Re: Bot question.
It's basically anything that is macro'ed or automated via code that interacts with the pages. Excluding copy and paste of course
. Even mouse clickers would be classed as a macro (or automation, depending how it's used).
Field Marshall wrote:Really?Sol wrote:It's not going to destroy your life
I think this is sig worthy in fact.

-
Cwalen
- Fledgling Forumer
- Posts: 167
- Joined: Mon Nov 26, 2012 1:33 am
- ID: 0
Re: Bot question.
or reading again,
Juliette. I know that automated input is illegal.
It's obvious that personal scraping is permissible by virtue of it occurring and being untraceable.
Is there an existing ruling on processing data served from SQW?
Juliette. I know that automated input is illegal.
It's obvious that personal scraping is permissible by virtue of it occurring and being untraceable.
Is there an existing ruling on processing data served from SQW?
-
Juliette Verified
- The Queen
- Posts: 31802
- Joined: Sun Feb 06, 2005 6:57 pm
- Race: Royalty
- ID: 4323
- Alternate name(s): Cersei Lannister
- Location: Ultima Thule
Re: Bot question.
If you do not use that data to create automated input, you should be able to do with it what you wish.Cwalen wrote:or reading again,
Juliette. I know that automated input is illegal.
It's obvious that personal scraping is permissible by virtue of it occurring and being untraceable.
Is there an existing ruling on processing data served from SQW?
(There are rules against posting stats (current stats, linked Main-Ascended IDs) on here, but that should be all.)

-
Cwalen
- Fledgling Forumer
- Posts: 167
- Joined: Mon Nov 26, 2012 1:33 am
- ID: 0
Re: Bot question.
WIN!
Where am I allowed not to post current stats?
It has been suggested to me (see .sig below) that if I follow my path I'll get snotted in ascended as well as massed in SGW.
Is it a function of time? (current) or posting (public).
Where am I allowed not to post current stats?
It has been suggested to me (see .sig below) that if I follow my path I'll get snotted in ascended as well as massed in SGW.
Is it a function of time? (current) or posting (public).
-
Juliette Verified
- The Queen
- Posts: 31802
- Joined: Sun Feb 06, 2005 6:57 pm
- Race: Royalty
- ID: 4323
- Alternate name(s): Cersei Lannister
- Location: Ultima Thule
Re: Bot question.
The combination.
You cannot post current stats publicly (on this forum).
*grin* Yes, your path of highest resistance seems quite amusing.
You cannot post current stats publicly (on this forum).
*grin* Yes, your path of highest resistance seems quite amusing.

-
Cwalen
- Fledgling Forumer
- Posts: 167
- Joined: Mon Nov 26, 2012 1:33 am
- ID: 0
Re: Bot question.
I am a weird contrary bastard, no lie.
Inclined to flights of fancy, getting too wasted to be eloquent.
With a tendency to express myself in song.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mfwN0X8YnWo
Fun, not NAQ or DMU.
Inclined to flights of fancy, getting too wasted to be eloquent.
With a tendency to express myself in song.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mfwN0X8YnWo
Fun, not NAQ or DMU.
