Something Very Intresting negative total army and naq lol

[[SGC_ReplicÅtors]]

Yup found him when i was foin my reagualr raidings...


here he is http://www.stargatewars.com/stats.php?id=42589


cant believe it 2 negatioves

[[SGC_ReplicÅtors]]

FOUND another one

http://www.stargatewars.com/stats.php?id=42588


lol

[*Crowley]

maybe also guys who bought and exchanged naq with a cheater?

[[SGC_ReplicÅtors]]

http://www.stargatewars.com/stats.php?id=42589


yup another one

[Sleipnir]

Notice the ID's, consecutive. Good chance it was a multi that has been punished....although a little harshly. Negative units, negative income, vicious circle.

[Ripsaw]

So if you were to attack or raid these people, would you lose naq or units to them? That would be absolutely hilarious! I'd try it, but I'm pretty poor in turns at the moment.

[[SGC_ReplicÅtors]]

dont do it its been proven in the past.....if u take negative naq its like u taking a portion of there debt


also about there UU i dont no what happens if u raid them.....




sliepner good eye i never knew the ID where consecutive

[Afentius]

Interesting... I've never seen this before, and if you spy on them, the spy report doesn't say anything about -soldiers or -UP...

[Kerrus Magrus]

yeah it does.:

Unit Type
Attackers Defenders Untrained

Mercenaries 0 0 0
Soldier 3 0 317
NID Agent 0 0 -9358

[Setesh]

poor guys

[Kerrus Magrus]

soo, negative uu, make negative naq? an say if you ried to train those negative uu, would not, untrain trained guys instead?

[[SGC_ReplicÅtors]]

will all be like reties.....180 degrees

[Sleipnir]

soo, negative uu, make negative naq? an say if you ried to train those negative uu, would not, untrain trained guys instead?

No, because training is just a check of a<b, where a is the number you try to train, and b is the number you have. If b is negative, you can never train anything, because the input box will even train 1 if you type -1. So you can't train negative amounts.

[JIX]

i gave the poor guy some naq a few turns later he was back in the -neg

[Artiglio]

i gave the poor guy some naq a few turns later he was back in the -neg

i guess thats what happens when you have negative income