descension

For discussion on balance, bugs, likes, dislikes of recently released features.
Locked
User avatar
compmage
Moderation Wizard
Posts: 398
Joined: Thu Feb 10, 2005 12:45 pm
Race: Daimon
ID: 5149
Location: South Africa
Contact:

Honours and Awards

311 [TA] wrote:a player that has covert /anti-covert 31 and has that reset may not agree with you on it being easy to take care of in 1 month....if they need to ascend again


The main suggestions to far say nothing about losing spy levels, only ascended bonuses, even for those that are descend completely back to their original race, they would keep all their covert levels and UP rates, they simply lose all the % bonuses to strike etc.
Posting as General Mod

In the beginning, the universe was created. This has made a lot of people very angry, and is generally considered to have been a bad move.
- Douglas Adams
311 [TA]
Forum Expert
Posts: 1062
Joined: Mon Jul 18, 2005 3:41 pm
ID: 0

compmage wrote:
311 [TA] wrote:a player that has covert /anti-covert 31 and has that reset may not agree with you on it being easy to take care of in 1 month....if they need to ascend again


The main suggestions to far say nothing about losing spy levels, only ascended bonuses, even for those that are descend completely back to their original race, they would keep all their covert levels and UP rates, they simply lose all the % bonuses to strike etc.


i agree with forums idea alot

if HOWEVER the lose 5% bonus happens, then many will be knocked from 25% to 20% etc... etc..

and to get back to where they were they would have to ascend and THUS lose there coverts, im sorry if i didnt explain it further but i think im digressing

forums idea is perfect.......the shock of losing everything of ascended bonuses for 1 month is a big BLOW....and we should see how much that really hurts before we start making peoplel lose other stuff as well
All that is necessary for the triumph of evil,
is good men do nothing.
Image
Image
*Much props to greenman for my wicked new sig, thanks G oh yeaaaaaaaaah! *
User avatar
compmage
Moderation Wizard
Posts: 398
Joined: Thu Feb 10, 2005 12:45 pm
Race: Daimon
ID: 5149
Location: South Africa
Contact:

Honours and Awards

311 [TA] wrote:i agree with forums idea alot

if HOWEVER the lose 5% bonus happens, then many will be knocked from 25% to 20% etc... etc..

and to get back to where they were they would have to ascend and THUS lose there coverts, im sorry if i didnt explain it further but i think im digressing

forums idea is perfect.......the shock of losing everything of ascended bonuses for 1 month is a big BLOW....and we should see how much that really hurts before we start making peoplel lose other stuff as well


If they lose their covert levels because they re-ascend then it is because they CHOOSE to do so. If they think the benefits are not worth the risk then they don't have to reasend.

I only ascended about 2 months after ascension came out and I am working on my last ascension now. I would be very upset if I was descended, even once but I knew from reading the pages you go threw in the ascension process that I could be descended and it is implied that you could lose everything. I was willing to take that risk since a wargame where you can't be completely destroyed (or almost so) isn't nearly as much fun and much less of a challenge and frankly the only reason I have worked so hard on getting my ascensions right and building a page 1 ascension account is because you would be able to do so much damage when descension became available.
Posting as General Mod

In the beginning, the universe was created. This has made a lot of people very angry, and is generally considered to have been a bad move.
- Douglas Adams
311 [TA]
Forum Expert
Posts: 1062
Joined: Mon Jul 18, 2005 3:41 pm
ID: 0

well i will agree to disagree

i completly see your point of view

I just think forums plan is a good first step on handling de-secsions to test the waters and im going to stick with that.
All that is necessary for the triumph of evil,
is good men do nothing.
Image
Image
*Much props to greenman for my wicked new sig, thanks G oh yeaaaaaaaaah! *
CrimsonFrost
Forum Regular
Posts: 590
Joined: Sat Sep 03, 2005 7:04 am
ID: 0
Location: Spain

I have sacked plenty millions of UU to make sure my ascended account is strong enough to NOT get descended. If this 1 month rule goes into effect, im simply putting vacation mode and wont play ascension anymore. No one can actually be beaten, and its just a fancy replica of the main server.

Im not going to waste all my hard earned resources reascending for the sole purpose of taking away 5% of someones bonus for a MONTH. It actually makes me laugh! Next thing you know, ascension is going to go to the exact path that main is currently at. People build into the trillions of power and never worring about ever being completely defeated.
<Fatana> Crimson you scare me on how much you like to mass :)

CrimsonFrost says:
"Blah blah, your making me mad, stop breaking the rules, locked"

MISC Moderator
311 [TA]
Forum Expert
Posts: 1062
Joined: Mon Jul 18, 2005 3:41 pm
ID: 0

CrimsonFrost wrote:I have sacked plenty millions of UU to make sure my ascended account is strong enough to NOT get descended. If this 1 month rule goes into effect, im simply putting vacation mode and wont play ascension anymore. No one can actually be beaten, and its just a fancy replica of the main server.

Im not going to waste all my hard earned resources reascending for the sole purpose of taking away 5% of someones bonus for a MONTH. It actually makes me laugh! Next thing you know, ascension is going to go to the exact path that main is currently at. People build into the trillions of power and never worring about ever being completely defeated.


I must point out it is 100% of there bonuses for the month

there is a group of people suggesting that on top of that you lose 5% of your bonus in main PERMANTLEY

and i believe very soon people will not be able to go on vacation mode in ascended like they can now

let me show forums original post abotu the bonuses

it gets descended on main server, losing all ascended bonuses for ONE MONTH.

When one month is up, normal main bonuses return; ascension returns to normal (can be attacked personally).
All that is necessary for the triumph of evil,
is good men do nothing.
Image
Image
*Much props to greenman for my wicked new sig, thanks G oh yeaaaaaaaaah! *
User avatar
Wolf359
The Big Bad Admin
Posts: 5208
Joined: Sat Feb 19, 2005 2:40 am
Alliance: EPA
Race: Tauri
ID: 0
Location: Omnipresent
Contact:

Honours and Awards

Okay - a few points:

1 - It has been stated by some people that no warning was given of this - well what exactly do you call this thread? Secondly - there has been talk of descension coming and what it might do since the day that the Ascension server went online - both in the Ascended forum and in the main forum.

2 - Ascension and Main are NOT separate games - the sheer fact that you get/improve your ascended account by ascending in main should prove that - along with the fact that you get Ascended Blessing in main for your second ascension.

3 - Descension was always coming - and always with the intent that it would affect Main.

4 - Of course vacation mode in ascension should be limited in some way - preferably using one of the methods I've suggested - not to have it restricted would mean that people are falsely claiming their bonuses in Main and would have NO risk of losing them - which is unfair to the people who actually play Ascension.

AS ever - I am open to compromise - and think something along the line sof Bahamut's idea for G&R could be employed for those who wish to improve their account without ascending - although doing so in such a manner should have less of an effect on your account than what ascension does.
Image
Severian wrote:So I say as a last resort, splice Semper & Wolf359 for a good balance, Clone said unholy abomination a hundred times, let loose on forums and problem solved.
Mod Speak
~Phoenix~
Forum Addict
Posts: 2710
Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2005 3:29 am
Alliance: Unaligned
Race: Immortal

Hammond of Texas wrote:
Tok_Ra wrote:But its called the MAIN server for a reason, its the one that the most people play. Most people would have that be the main if not only account to join.

how did you come up with that one. how do you know what most people want?

all i see is people saying main and ascention should be linked, there are only two saying otherwise. and that to me is not MOST people.


If you are reffering to me.. i dont actually know.. the I dont want you to respond to me any more since you haven't paid any attention to what I have said..

If you werent talking to me, then I completly agree with what you were saying :D

--------------------

Just consider.. 1month is A LONG TIME, this game has only been around for what? 16? 17?

Its a hell of a long time to lose all bonuses... MUCH WORSE than losing 1 level each month, since you could easily ascend 2 or 3 times in 1month...

You want to kill people? Admins way is probably the most effective way..
Image
311 [TA]
Forum Expert
Posts: 1062
Joined: Mon Jul 18, 2005 3:41 pm
ID: 0

~Phoenix~ wrote:
Hammond of Texas wrote:
Tok_Ra wrote:But its called the MAIN server for a reason, its the one that the most people play. Most people would have that be the main if not only account to join.

how did you come up with that one. how do you know what most people want?

all i see is people saying main and ascention should be linked, there are only two saying otherwise. and that to me is not MOST people.


If you are reffering to me.. i dont actually know.. the I dont want you to respond to me any more since you haven't paid any attention to what I have said..

If you werent talking to me, then I completly agree with what you were saying :D

--------------------

Just consider.. 1month is A LONG TIME, this game has only been around for what? 16? 17?

Its a hell of a long time to lose all bonuses... MUCH WORSE than losing 1 level each month, since you could easily ascend 2 or 3 times in 1month...

You want to kill people? Admins way is probably the most effective way..


EXACTLY!!!!
All that is necessary for the triumph of evil,
is good men do nothing.
Image
Image
*Much props to greenman for my wicked new sig, thanks G oh yeaaaaaaaaah! *
Hammond
Fledgling Forumer
Posts: 195
Joined: Mon Jul 18, 2005 4:40 pm
ID: 0

lol you nut case. :-D

i was responding to Tok_Ra thats why i quoted him
Image
User avatar
Wolf359
The Big Bad Admin
Posts: 5208
Joined: Sat Feb 19, 2005 2:40 am
Alliance: EPA
Race: Tauri
ID: 0
Location: Omnipresent
Contact:

Honours and Awards

Can Forum confirm if 'gets descended in main' = losing a level of ascension - i.e. going from Living God to Incarnate? That is teh only bit I'm not sure on.
Image
Severian wrote:So I say as a last resort, splice Semper & Wolf359 for a good balance, Clone said unholy abomination a hundred times, let loose on forums and problem solved.
Mod Speak
Funky White Boy
Forum Irregular
Posts: 404
Joined: Thu Jan 12, 2006 2:26 pm
ID: 0
Location: Doing the Funky Chicken

Sorry to keep banging on at this 1vs1 idea

I think if we make this essentially a duel between 2 accounts. The player whoose life force is depleted to Zero is forced to descend for say 4 weeks and after this time is unable to do personal attacks or be attacked for a further 2 weeks. Once initiated the duel is a fight to the death neither party can leave the field until it is complete and no other players can interfere

That way the agressor may find themselves descended at the end of the duel rather than the defender.

I am a single ascender and I have worked hard to keep up with multiple ascenders to the extent I have had to rejoin the main game having left primarily to build my ascension account. I think that complete descension would just make people who have worked so hard VERY annoyed!
~Phoenix~
Forum Addict
Posts: 2710
Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2005 3:29 am
Alliance: Unaligned
Race: Immortal

Wolf359 wrote:Can Forum confirm if 'gets descended in main' = losing a level of ascension - i.e. going from Living God to Incarnate? That is teh only bit I'm not sure on.


I think what he ment... was that say.. LG+1.. gets 30% bonus to atk, defense, covert, etc...

You lose that for 1 month regardless of what level, not actual ascension's.

I think he made an extra post explaining that somewhere.
Image
311 [TA]
Forum Expert
Posts: 1062
Joined: Mon Jul 18, 2005 3:41 pm
ID: 0

Wolf359 wrote:Can Forum confirm if 'gets descended in main' = losing a level of ascension - i.e. going from Living God to Incarnate? That is teh only bit I'm not sure on.


When one month is up, normal main bonuses return; ascension returns to normal (can be attacked personally).


from forum himself, his idea makes everyhing come back to how it was before the descesion aka 30% bonus would come back, but you lose it ALL for 1 month

however he does talk abotu some sorta mark of shame that is a suprise for main, what that is i dont know

the whole losing a level of ascesion.....is a suggestion some people keep bringing up but it is not in forums original post
All that is necessary for the triumph of evil,
is good men do nothing.
Image
Image
*Much props to greenman for my wicked new sig, thanks G oh yeaaaaaaaaah! *
~Phoenix~
Forum Addict
Posts: 2710
Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2005 3:29 am
Alliance: Unaligned
Race: Immortal

311 [TA] wrote:
Wolf359 wrote:Can Forum confirm if 'gets descended in main' = losing a level of ascension - i.e. going from Living God to Incarnate? That is teh only bit I'm not sure on.


When one month is up, normal main bonuses return; ascension returns to normal (can be attacked personally).


from forum himself, his idea makes everyhing come back to how it was before the descesion aka 30% bonus would come back, but you lose it ALL for 1 month

however he does talk abotu some sorta mark of shame that is a suprise for main, what that is i dont know

the whole losing a level of ascesion.....is a suggestion some people keep bringing up but it is not in forums original post


Still... keep ascended weps.. things like that. Just the % to atk, def, etc and the ascended blessing..
Image
Locked

Return to “Discussion on Released Enhancements”