Planet recycling system

Locked
Darth Arias
Forum Newbie
Posts: 42
Joined: Wed Aug 02, 2006 4:22 pm
ID: 0
Location: EK

Planet recycling system

This could be in addition to some of the recent planet ideas.

I propose that any planet that is not improved after a certain length of time, whether it is in defense or the bonus, be released back into the galaxy so someone else can take it, but the defense goes back to 0. This will get rid of the loose planets that are lost in the low ranks of those who don't play. On the off chance that someone does play and hasn't improved the planet, it could send you a message saying:

"The residents of (planet name) have rebelled, as they have been ignored for the past (however long until it is released). The rebels have defeated the army stationed there and managed to release the planet from your system. The chances of seeing the planet and its inhabitants again are slim."

Or something like that. The timeframe could be anywhere from a week to a month or something before it is released, and could maybe include a warning, like:

"Your army reports that (planet name) has been acting rebellious lately."

Or something.

This will keep more planets being put back in, and will keep people improving their planets as well, so they don't just sit in the person's system without any problems.

This is up for debate and suggestions, and sounds like it would be a good add-on to any other planet upgrade, or by itself.
Image
Balladbird
Forum Irregular
Posts: 395
Joined: Sun May 07, 2006 6:50 pm
ID: 0
Location: Hollow Bastion

This idea gets a No from me because it would hurt n00bs who dont have naq to continously upgrade planets. This would also make planet theft worse, for when n00bs lost their planets after they couldnt pay for them, they would resort to taking them from others.
Image
Tyber Zann
JUAN's Successor, Buck's Inheritor, Semper's mailed fist
Posts: 1873
Joined: Fri Apr 28, 2006 2:47 pm
Alternate name(s): Tyber Zann, tom twin

mmm im not so sure about this.

It means the people who cant afford to buy much anyway have to spend naq improving things they dont want to....

An improvment on planets could be good, but im not sure about this one
Help find my old Tyber Zann sigs :(
Finarfin
Forum Regular
Posts: 540
Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2005 3:00 pm
Alliance: Deathwing
Race: Tollan
ID: 40002

Hmm... no.
User avatar
Dagr
Forum Expert
Posts: 1345
Joined: Sat Dec 31, 2005 8:24 pm
Race: Asgard
ID: 50627
Alternate name(s): Day
Location: U.S.A.

no because once u have ur planet good theres not much a point into putting more in, plus there would b alot of ppl who might 4get on accident
R3B3L
Forum Elder
Posts: 2109
Joined: Sun Sep 24, 2006 3:01 am
Race: Asgard
ID: 29252
Location: Leciester, England
Contact:

Finarfin wrote:Hmm... no.
Zeratul
Elder Administrator
Posts: 23203
Joined: Sat May 06, 2006 8:44 am
Alliance: Lucian Alliance
Race: Templar
ID: 7
Alternate name(s): Hrefna
Reitha
Location: Nivlheim

Honours and Awards

a better thing would be to have their stats decrease if they are not improved over time... so if the planet gives say 960 million naq per day, and it is neglected for say 1 month, with no improvement in bonus nor in defense, the naq produced starts to drop, and stops only when it is upgraded to more than it was at before being neglected... perhaps defense should also drop, say first 6 facilities per day, and after a time 12 per day, etc... till almost no stats, then if it gets to no stats, planet looses its orbit, and is released into the void...
Image
Image
"Great holy armies shall be gathered and trained to fight all who embrace evil. In the name of the gods, Browsers shall be changed to carry the internet out amongst the peoples and we will spread Firefox to all the unbelievers. The power of the Firefox will be felt far and wide and the wicked users of IE shall be converted to use the true browsers."

Curious about our color? Feel free to ask...
Kaska
Fledgling Forumer
Posts: 147
Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2006 6:25 am
Alliance: [ HervardI Training ]
Race: Ancient
ID: 73626
Location: Slovenija
Contact:

like this one
Image
My IQ is 137 - Free-IQTest.net - Free IQ Tests
Sekmetsa

I would have to say instead of having the planet takin away because of tha lack of improvement I would say take the planet away from the accounts that haven't been accessed for weeks or months.
Zeratul
Elder Administrator
Posts: 23203
Joined: Sat May 06, 2006 8:44 am
Alliance: Lucian Alliance
Race: Templar
ID: 7
Alternate name(s): Hrefna
Reitha
Location: Nivlheim

Honours and Awards

our suggestion wouldnt take the planets away from active players, as those that do nothing to their planets for one whole month, are not active... and those who would start loosing stats, would just have to buy back that which was lost + a little more, then they could wait another month before doing anything else...
Image
Image
"Great holy armies shall be gathered and trained to fight all who embrace evil. In the name of the gods, Browsers shall be changed to carry the internet out amongst the peoples and we will spread Firefox to all the unbelievers. The power of the Firefox will be felt far and wide and the wicked users of IE shall be converted to use the true browsers."

Curious about our color? Feel free to ask...
Darth Arias
Forum Newbie
Posts: 42
Joined: Wed Aug 02, 2006 4:22 pm
ID: 0
Location: EK

Although alot of people said no to the original idea because of poor noobs, and that also would be bad for noobs.

Then again, why would noobs have planets? They don't need them yet.

By upgrade, I meant even a simple 1 increase in anything. Seriously, if that is not affordable, maybe you have too many planets for your level.
Image
Locked

Return to “Suggestions Archive”