A new twist to UP.

[hfown]

i dont know.... im thinking, no...

AT's will be used a lot more, farming naq... i just cant see any huge problems coming from this, also just cant see anything very good coming from this either.

[Zasz]

i like this idea, it is interesting, and choosing a percentage of uu trained into lifers is nice. I can see nothing bad coming from that.
Neither do i see a problem with more attack turns being used, as that would possibly stop the needless massing of accounts for minor offenses. The only problem i see, is that raiding would become much less useful, as there would be less uu available on most accounts.

[Sleipnir]

I don't really see what the point is. Bill, could you point out why you suggested this? A problem you see that needs fixing? Or just because? Maybe if I can see a reason behind it, I can give an opinion as to wether it's good or bad. As it stands now, I see no reason to update this. Ain't broke, so....

[KKatastrophe]

I don't see anything wrong with a % of up going to lifers, but at the same time, I don't see a real motivation for it either.

Maybe the 'kids' just need to be paying rent, earning their keep. Say, any trained unit besides a miner/lifer would cost a certain amount per turn/day for maintenance/upkeep - this is one way inflation could be reduced in the game.

[[Arbiter]]

Don't really like it

[god]

There'd be a problem with the "Dead" accounts having more and more and more of an income... it would ruin the ballance of the game... in that there'd be too much Naq available...

too much naq is better for the game than too many UU

[Zeratul]

how is it better?

[Envy]

Well on once side it's a good thing but on the other way it will be harder to raid so i don't see really a point in it

[Shooting Star]

Rank for UP I like.

Autotraining of UU into lifers, not so much. I have quite enough lifers as it is right now, and don't need anymore.