I recently changed my race, and at the same time was concentrating on my UP. I got the UP to 820, and I was happy to see that the increase in UP was already affecting my naq production, something that had been quite dissapointing up until then. The naq per turn was about 880k when I noticed, aout a day or two after the race change, that I no longer had a commander. I figured the race change must have done it, since there was no bad blood that I knew of between us, so I contacted my commander and he welcomed me back as an officer. I looked at me naq this morning and it is back down to just above 800k/turn.
So my question is can having a commander actually decrease naq production? I was under the impression having a commander helped. My UP is same, and my naq production is less. I didn't use any of my unassigned troops, so shouldn't naq production have gone up? Is this something my commander is causing, or just an odd fluke of the game? I don't want to accuse him of anything out of ignorance.
Please help
Can Commanders take your naq?
-
Grey Wolf
- Fledgling Forumer
- Posts: 134
- Joined: Tue Aug 30, 2005 5:45 pm
- ID: 0
- Location: Looming in the distance...
- Lørd Søbek
- Forum Irregular
- Posts: 421
- Joined: Sun May 29, 2005 5:19 pm
- ID: 0
- Location: Ruling over my ascended realm of Åristøn
- Lørd Søbek
- Forum Irregular
- Posts: 421
- Joined: Sun May 29, 2005 5:19 pm
- ID: 0
- Location: Ruling over my ascended realm of Åristøn
-
agapooka
- Semper Ubi Sub Ubi
- Posts: 2607
- Joined: Thu Mar 31, 2005 4:34 am
- ID: 0
-
Honours and Awards
Or if he gets more officers.
Agapooka wrote:The argument that because a premise cannot be proven false, it must be true, is known as a Negative Proof Fallacy in logic.
Pooka's UU Market Loyalty Card:Mister Sandman wrote:Nothing at all near the negative proof fallacy in logic. If it cannot be proven false, it has to be true.
Rudy Pena: 1 stamp!
A Spider: 1 stamp!
- Lørd Søbek
- Forum Irregular
- Posts: 421
- Joined: Sun May 29, 2005 5:19 pm
- ID: 0
- Location: Ruling over my ascended realm of Åristøn
-
agapooka
- Semper Ubi Sub Ubi
- Posts: 2607
- Joined: Thu Mar 31, 2005 4:34 am
- ID: 0
-
Honours and Awards
or fi someone raided him... good old days, bring raid back!!! 
Agapooka wrote:The argument that because a premise cannot be proven false, it must be true, is known as a Negative Proof Fallacy in logic.
Pooka's UU Market Loyalty Card:Mister Sandman wrote:Nothing at all near the negative proof fallacy in logic. If it cannot be proven false, it has to be true.
Rudy Pena: 1 stamp!
A Spider: 1 stamp!
- Psi Kiya Trist
- The Timeless One
- Posts: 7416
- Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2005 4:56 pm
- ID: 4266
- Location: Searching for my life in the real world
- Contact:
-
Honours and Awards
-
agapooka
- Semper Ubi Sub Ubi
- Posts: 2607
- Joined: Thu Mar 31, 2005 4:34 am
- ID: 0
-
Honours and Awards
But Psi, I said that in the other topic
LOL
Agapooka wrote:The argument that because a premise cannot be proven false, it must be true, is known as a Negative Proof Fallacy in logic.
Pooka's UU Market Loyalty Card:Mister Sandman wrote:Nothing at all near the negative proof fallacy in logic. If it cannot be proven false, it has to be true.
Rudy Pena: 1 stamp!
A Spider: 1 stamp!
- Psi Kiya Trist
- The Timeless One
- Posts: 7416
- Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2005 4:56 pm
- ID: 4266
- Location: Searching for my life in the real world
- Contact:
-
Honours and Awards
Agapooka wrote:But Psi, I said that in the other topicLOL
other topics don't matter much in this forum... most just post their questions here without looking through and seeing if they've been answered already.
it's a sad truth... but i live with it.
~_+Psi Kiya Trist+_~


buck wrote:well psi, upkeeping order in the universe does play its tricks on your mind...
-
agapooka
- Semper Ubi Sub Ubi
- Posts: 2607
- Joined: Thu Mar 31, 2005 4:34 am
- ID: 0
-
Honours and Awards
*sniff* Who's working on the manual then? 
Agapooka wrote:The argument that because a premise cannot be proven false, it must be true, is known as a Negative Proof Fallacy in logic.
Pooka's UU Market Loyalty Card:Mister Sandman wrote:Nothing at all near the negative proof fallacy in logic. If it cannot be proven false, it has to be true.
Rudy Pena: 1 stamp!
A Spider: 1 stamp!
-
Grey Wolf
- Fledgling Forumer
- Posts: 134
- Joined: Tue Aug 30, 2005 5:45 pm
- ID: 0
- Location: Looming in the distance...

