Rokas wrote:I personally didn't like the show and SG seemed to be much more of my taste. It was aiming for part-realism from the beginning(most of stuff can be explained scientific, heck, even shielding isn't unreal thing). Never liked any show that tried to play the future of humanity(i.e 500/1000 years after our era) - simply it is just impossible to know how will humanity evolve(if at all) and all of it seems too much of fiction than science.
BSG being in lines with Star-trek in the very bottom.
Battlestar Galactica is not on the same line as Star Trek. Star Trek dealt with the future of our race, the humans of Earth. BSG is about a different set of humans, who lived on seperate worlds, and who formed their own distinct civilisation. BSG is, in my opinion, what sci-fi is all about. Its about people dealing with situations that have a futuristic twist.
Rokas wrote:But again, it's only my taste. The best TV show ever written for me is Prison Break... SG goes far into the list after shows like "Firends" or "Married with children"(the El Bundy stuff) and so on.
You what? You can't rate differently themed shows against each other. You can't rate a comedy against a sci-fi. Married with Children was a brilliant show, but i would never rate it against Stargate or Battlestar Galactica. I would rate them both against Prison Break as they are similar.
BSG is probably one of the ballsiest shows on the box at the moment. How many others deal with current events, such as terrorism, suicide bombings. It is even bold enough to look at terrorism from the other side.







