Vendetta wrote:Jeff, I like you, and the fact your tryingto find a way to end this. But this isnt going to work. As you said if people dont like it, in a week we can go back to this etc etc. All that does is give CoP a chance to rebuild and all the members who ran to dune to come back. For when it DOES start again as we all know it will. The only half reasonably attempt i saw was Smooshables, simply because it took CIA intrests into mind as well and not just CoP's. And really, all this does is help CoP. People agreeing to this (from both sides and neutrals) have you not read or been told what this war is for? It wasnt to smack CoP around a bit then let them go back to the regular once THEY get sick of it.
And STI your proposal goes completely off trusting CoP to change thier ways, you know it wont happen and we know it wont happen. Hell even if we get CoP to disband people from CoP will probably just reform it, but atleast we would have accomplished what we set out for, and then we will get to do it all over again
Either way. CoP gets these outs and these outs only.
Disband CoP
Join DUNE
Publicaly announce personal/alliance surrender and leave war
Leave the game.
Those are CoP members outs as stated many times by various CIA members. And im highly doubting a compromise will be agreed apon after DD's "peace talks"

Well, atleast smoosh started out ok right
Ok well im tired and more than sure i missed a fair bit, and you can probably tell i didnt bother reading the increasingly long posts. Whatever.
Bye.
Trust & yes a lot of what I said I said because of Trust.
why
why would COP members rebuild until this is sorted. ( this works for both sides)
people who have joined have said they have no intension of rejoining (but yes agai this has to be taking on trust) but both sides are in DUNE
Smooshables attempt, i was told failed because it got to complicated, so this is why i tried to make it simple.
yes you saw what i was saying that, it was trusting COP to change their ways ( & i have based this on what i have been told) but yes it is again trust.
I will not go on explaining what i did, because nearly all of you saw what i was trying & took it as what it was. & i thank you for reading it & taking the time to just thin about it.
now i will get to why i am posting.
LBWMTE- D4rk S1de wrote:
The idea STI puts forward, I mean when I first saw it I laughed, your basically saying well, we're tired now, so can you just give up please, you don't make mention of chaanging anything, so basically, the COP gets what it wants, CIA surrenders and stops fighting and COP go back to building a reputation as an untouchable bully.
bamse wrote
Exactly! Smile
& then what followed
Jadzia wrote
KGB is annoyed by this lack of neutrality on the side of the leader of D U N E and other professed neutral parties.
We wish to put forth a motion demanding to lift the 'neutrality' of any and all neutral parties. It is our desire to invoke a Total Krieg. *Everyone* and we mean everyone is to fight, whether they want to or not.
Choose sides, form your own side... do whatever you must. But for Gamesake, do *not* pretend to be neutral while speaking the words of one party in all this.
In short, we second LBWMTE's and Bamse's words, and their inherent implication. In layman's terms, we are ticked off by this breach of neutrality.
& then this
I take it was aimed at DUNE (because it came straight after the other stuff)
Major Lincoln LaFayette wrote
False 'neutrals' will not 'spin' us from the real knowledge of why and how we have fought this war. Repeated propaganda statements that say the same things over and over again from the same small group of people will not change what large numbers of us have experienced.
well I will deal with the last one first.
It is no use jumping from page one to the end of the thread & then posting.
people who have read what i said about the reasons for the war (COP related), will know that i have been fully neatral ( i have said bad stuff about CIA & COP)
It seems that i must only say bad stuff about COP to be neatral.
is in your post, infact you could have nearly made you entire post from stuff i have already said.
Now for the top one,
Yep like i said in a post at least it did some good by making you laugh (someone can find my post i am sure of it

) but you have to read the whole thread to understand the meaning
Now how the hell do you get from my first post to LBWMTE- D4rk S1de wrote: post to bamse post (quote "Exactly! Smile") to this.
"KGB is annoyed by this lack of neutrality on the side of the leader of D U N E and other professed neutral parties.
We wish to put forth a motion demanding to lift the 'neutrality' of any and all neutral parties. It is our desire to invoke a Total Krieg. *Everyone* and we mean everyone is to fight, whether they want to or not.
Choose sides, form your own side... do whatever you must. But for Gamesake, do *not* pretend to be neutral while speaking the words of one party in all this.
In short, we second LBWMTE's and Bamse's words, and their inherent implication. In layman's terms, we are ticked off by this breach of neutrality."
Jeff (S T I)