UBERN00B! wrote:...It was about the mod's actions and their conspiracy of silence that didn't quite work....Yet this big conspiracy to withold information because you just don't trust us...
Conspiracy to withhold info? If anyone is seriously believing/considering that, you need to consider everything again. You are making it sound like we scoured the forum looking for posts about it and they were removed, or said player was given special protection not afforded to anyone else. Do you have any evidence of this?
Perhaps everyone should look at these threads:
http://herebegames.com/StarGateWars/vie ... 97&start=6(you may recognize the poster in the above thread)
http://herebegames.com/StarGateWars/vie ... 3&start=48http://herebegames.com/StarGateWars/vie ... 8&start=18(and further down)http://herebegames.com/StarGateWars/vie ... 8&start=24There many more. What info. did we withhold or what did we cover up? It is there for everyone to see. We were talking about what to do about it. Please don't act like this is
Watergate, or the
Sponsorship Scandal. There was never a cover up, and nothing that was posted by users was
EVER removed or edited about this. No user was told that they can't discuss what they were talking about. For example, were you ever approached by admin or mod and told by anyone to edit the post in the first link, or that you should not be talking about it?
What we as mods and admin discuss in the mod station can be private and confidential. There is a level of secrecy as to what we discuss there due to the level/nature of the information. Would you expect any less? For example, would you want mods who deal with IP and possibly personal/sensitive user information to talk about it to anyone? What happens in the mod station, stays in the mod station...for all issues, not just this.
What conspiracy are you talking about? I'm really tired of reading this stuff about mods protecting someone and hiding identities. Has anyone been told they have to disclose their identity to the rest of the forum? Has anyone been approached by admin or mods who tell than that they have to tell the community? Do mods or admin post the multi forum account for everyone that has one?
The same rules should apply to everyone.No where does it say that what is discussed between mods or admin has to be discussed with users. Do we share the results of investigations with users, or perhaps(when the need arises, for example) disclose IP addresses to the community?
Explain how it's right to do that to one person when it hasn't been done for anyone else? Can you explain how that would be ethical? Someone might argue that said player did worse, but why must we stoop to that level. The mods are better than that. Even if someone has done terrible things they must be treated fairly and justly. It is what separates us from those that would do terrible things.
When I get an application for the Respect Group I ask, most times, if the applicant has a multi forum account. If they tell me what forum accounts they have it is my responsibility to keep that info safe. It is their choice to disclose it or not. Are you saying I should be telling people what other pples multis exist? Or perhaps when an IP check is done for a ban or perm. ban the IPs should be shared with everyone here?
UBERN00B! wrote:...But Bad Wolf quit because of it so obviously it had been on that back burner for quite a while....
I brought up the issue on May 3/07. That is 17 days ago, and currently there are 90 posts in the thread. That totals to 5.29 posts/day discussing this, and step were being taken. This issue was hardly on 'the back burner'.
UBERN00B! wrote:...I personally question whether it was a case of hoping the problem would just go away by itself.... or were the mod team hoping someone else would spill the beans so the decision would be taken out of their hands?
I don't know how to even address that. Either you think the mod team is incompetent or they don't care. Both of which are totally false. We were debating/discussing what to do, and steps were being taken.
UBERN00B! wrote:...That's the whole point - this community isn't stupid. But when we are treated as if we are then expect a backlash...
Decision were made by admin when said player was let back in, and Pookie said. As it has been posted by other mods, some said she should get another chance, and some did not agree. The position we found ourself in was dealing with the cards that we were dealt, and doing so properly. That is what we were charged with.
sarcasmsvoice wrote:...Just when exactly will the Mods be Mods and stop doing their best impressions of Pepe Le Pew meets Admin meets chicken with head cut off?...
Now, now. Lets not flame/name call.
sarcasmsvoice wrote:...Until this is truly handled and not just mulled over and ranted about, this situation will continue...
This issue was being truley being handled by admin with mod and supermod input. Stating that it wasn't being done is not grounded in fact.
EDITS: are listed in green