raising AT's for smaller people.

Locked
User avatar
Envy
Forum Elder
Posts: 2422
Joined: Sat Feb 04, 2006 5:25 am
Race: System Lord
Location: Belguim

raising AT's for smaller people.

Well theirs a thread going on in Stargatewars General about the prices going grazy treu the markets.

smallers ones cant afford anything these day's so I would like to suggest the folowing for the smaller ones to raid (like a CAP) lets say people under 1 million UU gets 6 turns/turn .
Spoiler
7 sins : Envy , Sloth , Greed , Gluttony , Pride , Wrath , Lust.
Image
Munchy
Forum Expert
Posts: 1408
Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2006 8:54 pm
Alliance: Tauri Alliance
ID: 60881

Re: raising AT's for smaller people.

It has been suggested before, and all we managed to get implemented was the 3 turns/turn thing. To be honest though, it was one of the better and 'fairer' updates.
Image

ID=60881
badnews
Forum Grunt
Posts: 71
Joined: Wed Aug 09, 2006 3:02 pm
ID: 0

Re: raising AT's for smaller people.

Don't think theres a need to raise their ATs since bigger ones are stoped in growth by the cap....
Image
Image
Image
gooseman the first
Forum Intermediate
Posts: 796
Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 9:12 am
ID: 55105
Location: Dublin, working on a thing called 'humour'

Re: raising AT's for smaller people.

well i've never ever bought any turns and im doing just fine, so i see no need to raise the at production
Fallout
Forum Regular
Posts: 537
Joined: Mon Aug 21, 2006 2:18 am
Location: Estonia
Contact:

Re: raising AT's for smaller people.

why not, every update that is made only profit the big players, and if dose not profit big players it just sucks for small ones.

like the last one:
July 18, 2007
Death Rates during battle
These have increased slightly, to 3.5% on attack, 2.5% on defence.
Being at war does increase this.
The difference between your strength, and your enemies strength, also affects this - as it did before, although the effect of this difference has also increased. ie - attacking a much more powerful foe will result in more losses...a weaker foe in less losses...
(but keep in mind, as before, it is still a percent of YOUR forces that die, regardless of the enemy strength. So if you have a lot of forces, many will die...this is just the nature of huge amounts of beings with weapons all at the same place at the same time... this has not changed.)
The minimum of 20% of their defence power, in attack power, to damage them at all, still remains, as does the supers taking only 50% of normal losses.
User avatar
Dagr
Forum Expert
Posts: 1345
Joined: Sat Dec 31, 2005 8:24 pm
Race: Asgard
ID: 50627
Alternate name(s): Day
Location: U.S.A.

Re: raising AT's for smaller people.

Why did that happen with out people knowing?
Fallout
Forum Regular
Posts: 537
Joined: Mon Aug 21, 2006 2:18 am
Location: Estonia
Contact:

Re: raising AT's for smaller people.

cant say for sure but i have been told that one big player whined about it and here we are :S
Munchy
Forum Expert
Posts: 1408
Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2006 8:54 pm
Alliance: Tauri Alliance
ID: 60881

Re: raising AT's for smaller people.

Fallout[TÅ] wrote:cant say for sure but i have been told that one big player whined about it and here we are :S


Read this https://talk.gatewa.rs/viewtopic.php?f=101&t=62260&p=969760&hilit=#p969760

It has the reason.
Image

ID=60881
Zeratul
Elder Administrator
Posts: 23203
Joined: Sat May 06, 2006 8:44 am
Alliance: Lucian Alliance
Race: Templar
ID: 7
Alternate name(s): Hrefna
Reitha
Location: Nivlheim

Honours and Awards

Re: raising AT's for smaller people.

there is one problem with giving extra ats to some size players... multies&cheaters...
Image
Image
"Great holy armies shall be gathered and trained to fight all who embrace evil. In the name of the gods, Browsers shall be changed to carry the internet out amongst the peoples and we will spread Firefox to all the unbelievers. The power of the Firefox will be felt far and wide and the wicked users of IE shall be converted to use the true browsers."

Curious about our color? Feel free to ask...
Locked

Return to “Suggestions Archive”