Well theirs a thread going on in Stargatewars General about the prices going grazy treu the markets.
smallers ones cant afford anything these day's so I would like to suggest the folowing for the smaller ones to raid (like a CAP) lets say people under 1 million UU gets 6 turns/turn .
raising AT's for smaller people.
- Envy
- Forum Elder
- Posts: 2422
- Joined: Sat Feb 04, 2006 5:25 am
- Race: System Lord
- Location: Belguim
raising AT's for smaller people.
Spoiler
7 sins : Envy , Sloth , Greed , Gluttony , Pride , Wrath , Lust.

-
Munchy
- Forum Expert
- Posts: 1408
- Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2006 8:54 pm
- Alliance: Tauri Alliance
- ID: 60881
Re: raising AT's for smaller people.
It has been suggested before, and all we managed to get implemented was the 3 turns/turn thing. To be honest though, it was one of the better and 'fairer' updates.

ID=60881
-
badnews
- Forum Grunt
- Posts: 71
- Joined: Wed Aug 09, 2006 3:02 pm
- ID: 0
Re: raising AT's for smaller people.
Don't think theres a need to raise their ATs since bigger ones are stoped in growth by the cap....



-
gooseman the first
- Forum Intermediate
- Posts: 796
- Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 9:12 am
- ID: 55105
- Location: Dublin, working on a thing called 'humour'
Re: raising AT's for smaller people.
well i've never ever bought any turns and im doing just fine, so i see no need to raise the at production
-
Fallout
- Forum Regular
- Posts: 537
- Joined: Mon Aug 21, 2006 2:18 am
- Location: Estonia
- Contact:
Re: raising AT's for smaller people.
why not, every update that is made only profit the big players, and if dose not profit big players it just sucks for small ones.
like the last one:
like the last one:
July 18, 2007
Death Rates during battle
These have increased slightly, to 3.5% on attack, 2.5% on defence.
Being at war does increase this.
The difference between your strength, and your enemies strength, also affects this - as it did before, although the effect of this difference has also increased. ie - attacking a much more powerful foe will result in more losses...a weaker foe in less losses...
(but keep in mind, as before, it is still a percent of YOUR forces that die, regardless of the enemy strength. So if you have a lot of forces, many will die...this is just the nature of huge amounts of beings with weapons all at the same place at the same time... this has not changed.)
The minimum of 20% of their defence power, in attack power, to damage them at all, still remains, as does the supers taking only 50% of normal losses.
- Dagr
- Forum Expert
- Posts: 1345
- Joined: Sat Dec 31, 2005 8:24 pm
- Race: Asgard
- ID: 50627
- Alternate name(s): Day
- Location: U.S.A.
Re: raising AT's for smaller people.
Why did that happen with out people knowing?
-
Fallout
- Forum Regular
- Posts: 537
- Joined: Mon Aug 21, 2006 2:18 am
- Location: Estonia
- Contact:
Re: raising AT's for smaller people.
cant say for sure but i have been told that one big player whined about it and here we are :S
-
Munchy
- Forum Expert
- Posts: 1408
- Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2006 8:54 pm
- Alliance: Tauri Alliance
- ID: 60881
Re: raising AT's for smaller people.
Fallout[TÅ] wrote:cant say for sure but i have been told that one big player whined about it and here we are :S
Read this https://talk.gatewa.rs/viewtopic.php?f=101&t=62260&p=969760&hilit=#p969760
It has the reason.

ID=60881
-
Zeratul
- Elder Administrator
- Posts: 23203
- Joined: Sat May 06, 2006 8:44 am
- Alliance: Lucian Alliance
- Race: Templar
- ID: 7
- Alternate name(s): Hrefna
Reitha - Location: Nivlheim
-
Honours and Awards
Re: raising AT's for smaller people.
there is one problem with giving extra ats to some size players... multies&cheaters...


"Great holy armies shall be gathered and trained to fight all who embrace evil. In the name of the gods, Browsers shall be changed to carry the internet out amongst the peoples and we will spread Firefox to all the unbelievers. The power of the Firefox will be felt far and wide and the wicked users of IE shall be converted to use the true browsers."
Curious about our color? Feel free to ask...
