ramen07 wrote:
I'm the one with a 58mill army
A bit smaller because I just ascended but eh, around the same. If it's a small player with just a big strike, sab his weapons. Or, build a defense. It's kinda how you keep your naq...
So basically what you are saying is that I spend like 20 trill of naq to have some sort of descent defence just for someone who has strike and only strike can kill of for 1 trill naq expense.So later I can go to war with him and bore him till he dies?
What is there to sab?People have large strikes with 1 mill attack weapons and they are not loosing anything even if I would sabb that away.
ramen07 wrote:@Semper- In circumstances where Jason would look at players' problems with updates, he would implement changes in the beta server, then bring them about in main if they "fix the problem". However, this is not the case. I seriously doubt that Jason would stand back and do nothing if he saw these; I assume that he doesn't read players' complaints. And since he won't be changing anything anytime soon because of his lack of reading these threads, it would be better to not complain at all. Don't get me wrong, I'm all for your suggested changes. I simply believe that if Jason won't look at them, there's no conceivable way that they will be implemented, therefore you're speaking (quite eloquently) to deaf ears.
And majority of those updates were peoples wishes.Few of those were from Jasons own thinking.If anything he listens too much to people who are to lazy to play and only want for their account to be self sustained.But all those wishes backfired at all those people back.And now we have what people wanted.
But that wont,cant and must not stop people to post their suggestions to try to fix the game but its Jason job to figure it out what updates would benefit the game the most.After all its his game and his bread.It will affect him the most not us.