Turn Production

[Iƒrit]

also any chance you have or are considering increasing AT generation as to make massing more likely?

[Forum]

not against it for personal turns acquired somehow...

also any chance you have or are considering increasing AT generation as to make massing more likely?

[Ashu]

I think he meant for those automatically generated. So instead of 4, perhaps 5 or 6 per turn?

[Iƒrit]

I think he meant for those automatically generated. So instead of 4, perhaps 5 or 6 per turn?

actually meant realm generation and MTs but more is better? yes? no?

[Ashu]

I think he meant for those automatically generated. So instead of 4, perhaps 5 or 6 per turn?

actually meant realm generation and MTs but more is better? yes? no?

I subscribe!

[Lithium]

or just non tradable turns , no more multie at generators

[Clarkey]

To be honest they should all be non trade-able ATs. Trading ATs has never made sense right from the start. ATs are not physical unlike naq and UU. So when trading ATs what are we "actually" trading? Like I said... never made sense from the start.

[xDaku]

The game would become too slow if ATs weren't trade-able. As it is a smaller account has to use up a LOT of ats to compete with some of the bigger accounts and if the ATs became limited that gap would just grow.

[Clarkey]

The game would become too slow if ATs weren't trade-able. As it is a smaller account has to use up a LOT of ats to compete with some of the bigger accounts and if the ATs became limited that gap would just grow.

Unless the AT generation was exponentially increased. Anyway, I don't want to take this off topic so I'll leave it there.

[xDaku]

The game would become too slow if ATs weren't trade-able. As it is a smaller account has to use up a LOT of ats to compete with some of the bigger accounts and if the ATs became limited that gap would just grow.

Unless the AT generation was exponentially increased. Anyway, I don't want to take this off topic so I'll leave it there.

That's a thought

[Lithium]

10-15 ats /turn all non tradable

[Deadliest Wes]

well this discussion has went down hill since i left.

To be honest they should all be non trade-able ATs. Trading ATs has never made sense right from the start. ATs are not physical unlike naq and UU. So when trading ATs what are we "actually" trading? Like I said... never made sense from the start.

Turns are the only way to attack someone, leave them alone. If you get in a war, run out of turns who is gonna sell you more to buy them.

If you have played another online game like this, you will see everywhere they allow people to trade stuff you can trade attack turns. This is not orgins or choas or the other game. Leave it be. If you think about changing anything to the turns it should be strictly the amount generated.

[~squishie~]

For discussion on the updates go to https://talk.gatewa.rs/viewtopic.php?f=20&t=180902. This topic is in relation to the suggestion abou modifying turn production

~squishie~

[Empy]

Keep Generic Turn generation at what it is now, but I think it was a good idea to MAYBE add 1 or 2 Personal Turns to be generated. If you make it a nigh unlimited amount of attack turns available then you will get explosive growth of a few people who can afford to be on here ALL the time, and a large disparity will appear between (larger than there is now with people spending money). This will make people not like the game, needless to say...

[[SlayerS_fith]]

increase at's created through market turns might see the reborn of people buying mt's again.
that was some oldschool fun.

so increase whats in the market.
not increase the generic turn change would see a better market and more growth.

rather then increased feed accounts to sit dormant n collect.