Legendary Apophis wrote:Whoever made this comic is a fool.
Agreed.
Legendary Apophis wrote:Whoever made this comic is a fool.
Legendary Apophis wrote:Dr. House wrote:If Catholicism = Christianity then Judaism = Islam.
Oh looks like we finally found someone who believed the propaganda..

Malx wrote:Make kids not cancer!
Universe wrote:You don't have a case, as Lord Thriller clearly explained.
MajorLeeHurts wrote:^ stole the car and my Booze and my heart * sobs*
Jack wrote: Just wanna be more like you, Master Thriller.
Thriller wrote:Jacks from texas, if i remember correctly.
So your going to have to cut him some slack. If your not a white Protestant than you probably only a half cross look away from being on the buisness end of a lynch mod.
Dr. House wrote:Legendary Apophis wrote:Dr. House wrote:If Catholicism = Christianity then Judaism = Islam.
Oh looks like we finally found someone who believed the propaganda..
That's a rather stupid thing to say, considering that you said the samething only using more words.

Legendary Apophis wrote:Propaganda of course meant whoever believes Catholicism isn't christianism. I think nobody believed otherwise, if anyone did, I feel quite sorry for them.
Malx wrote:Make kids not cancer!
Dr. House wrote:I love though, how I present a different viewpoint and you feel the need to resort to petty insults with absolutely no attempt to prove me wrong. It only serves to show that you either know that what I say is true, or simply lack the mental capacities to engage me in an intellectual conversation.
) but JUST don't agree with you. Which is, no matter whether you are right or wrong, fact of not agreeing, a form of idiocy or stupidity in your eyes. Which is a false interpretation.

Kit-Fox wrote:Well Pops while christianity & catholotism had a shared inspiration & beginning they are now two very different faiths thanks in part to the changes that have happened. Such as co-opting beliefs & customs etc from religions that existed before them as well in the case of the catholic church constant revisions & various contradictoy papal views/comments (by that i mean one popes views/comments have ended up contradicting a previous pope)
So the argument could be made that they are two very different faiths now, its mearly a matter of interpretation

Legendary Apophis wrote:What you call "christianity" is different from what christianity was, which is similiar to what catholicism is, thus proving I am right.
Legendary Apophis wrote:Just because christianity as a whole is different from what it used to be doesn't mean that the new christianity is truer than catholicism (closer to what christianity used to be).
Dr. House wrote:I couldn't care less about the squabbles of religions and which is right(if any)
Legendary Apophis wrote:I also think that most of people who posted in this topic aren't "feeble minded" (oh look, you insulted as well) but JUST don't agree with you. Which is, no matter whether you are right or wrong, fact of not agreeing, a form of idiocy or stupidity in your eyes. Which is a false interpretation.
Legendary Apophis wrote:(oh look, you insulted as well)
Legendary Apophis wrote:I got to admit the very last part of your post is ridiculous..
Legendary Apophis wrote:But then I doubt protestants and orthodoxs have many things in common that catholicism doesn't, if you see what I mean. I think there's big differences between the three major pathes of christianism. Them being catholicism protestantism orthodoxism.
It often depends on where you live on how you will interpret christianism.

Malx wrote:Make kids not cancer!
Dr. House"
[quote="Legendary Apophis wrote:I also think that most of people who posted in this topic aren't "feeble minded" (oh look, you insulted as well) but JUST don't agree with you. Which is, no matter whether you are right or wrong, fact of not agreeing, a form of idiocy or stupidity in your eyes. Which is a false interpretation.
Legendary Apophis wrote:(oh look, you insulted as well)
Legendary Apophis wrote:But then I doubt protestants and orthodoxs have many things in common that catholicism doesn't, if you see what I mean. I think there's big differences between the three major pathes of christianism. Them being catholicism protestantism orthodoxism.
It often depends on where you live on how you will interpret christianism.



Malx wrote:Make kids not cancer!
Dr. House wrote:Pops, I never once said that any religion was the true religion, I even said that I don't care which is "true" and which isn't.

Legendary Apophis wrote:You said it's different to christianism.
Pops wrote:What you call "christianity" is different from what christianity was, which is similiar to what catholicism is, thus proving I am right.
Legendary Apophis wrote:Which leads to the question: what is the "today christianism" for you?
Legendary Apophis wrote:I used icons example to show protestants and orthodoxs are different.

Malx wrote:Make kids not cancer!
Dr. House wrote:Legendary Apophis wrote:You said it's different to christianism.
So did you.
Pops wrote:What you call "christianity" is different from what christianity was, which is similiar to what catholicism is, thus proving I am right.
Christianity changed doesn't mean it's not christianity anymore. If we were to take this path because one is turning different from the others and make a new religion from this...we would have hundred of religions in no time! It's not about clones...Religions change with time, it doesn't mean that sunnism and chiism aren't branches of islam. Same goes for christianism. Different (of course otherwise they would be all under same path) but still christianism.Legendary Apophis wrote:Which leads to the question: what is the "today christianism" for you?
It is as it applies to this thread.Legendary Apophis wrote:I used icons example to show protestants and orthodoxs are different.
And I haven't said they weren't.
